I seem to recall having had some prior issues with losing 'keyboard', a while back but will need to track on what build/s. Will try to aggregate that information. Maybe it will all start making sense :) Cheers Fabiana
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Simon Schampijer <[email protected]>wrote: > On 10/27/2010 11:00 AM, Fabiana Kubke wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Simon Schampijer<[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> On 10/23/2010 09:21 PM, Holt wrote: >>> >>>> Subject: >>>> testing summary auckland October 23 >>>> From: >>>> Fabiana Kubke<[email protected]> >>>> Date: >>>> Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:52:40 +1300 >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> When doing testing with the 0.90 builds on the XO you can file bugs that >>> are in Sugar at bugs.sugarlabs.org and add the olpc-0.90 keyword: >>> >>> >> OK >> >> >>> >>> Problem with unmounting USB >>>> XO 1.0 / Fedora 14 / Sugar 0.9 /Build 18 customised / Firmware Q2E45 >>>> XO 1.5 /Fedora 14 / Sugar 0.9 / Build 5 customized / Firmware Q3A58 >>>> Problem after using a usb causes problems such as frame key not working, >>>> alt-tab didn't work, function keys to shift to different views also do >>>> not work. Things listed on the journal could still be accessed and >>>> activities could be started and the frame can be called with the mouse. >>>> Restart of computer restored frame key function and function keys for >>>> neighborhood/journal etc. but alt-tab still does not work.It is not >>>> clear whether the usb was properly unmounted or not, mount command says >>>> it is not mounted but usb still has light on (which on my ubuntu means >>>> the usb is still mounted). It seems to be an issue with the keyboard >>>> talking to the system, everything seems to otherwise be working ok. >>>> >>> >>> Sounds a bit like: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2415 If you have >>> ways to reproduce this issue would be great. >>> >>> >> Could be. One of the testers queried whether the keyboard is connected via >> usb, which might partially explain the problem. >> >> As far as I recall, it happened on two different xo1.0 (didn't reproduce) >> but we reproduced on the xo1.5 (after restart). We can see if we can get >> some more info next testing meeting. >> >> Cheers, >> Fabiana >> >> >> >>> Turtle machine 7 >>>> XO 1.0 / Fedora 14 / Sugar 0.9 /Build 18 customised / Firmware Q2E45 >>>> Turtle machine 7: There is query about why a square with the little >>>> turtle and the finished shape on the left moves down in some instances >>>> upon successful completion of the shape (and get the happy wizard) but >>>> not in other instances. It moved through the first ~five levels and then >>>> stopped, and going back to lower levels did not restore it and still >>>> didn't move. Closing and restarting did not bring the moving turtle >>>> back. Closing and starting as new also didn't restore it, nor did >>>> restarting the computer. >>>> XO 1.5 /Fedora 14 / Sugar 0.9 / Build 5 customized / Firmware Q3A58 >>>> Turtle machine 7 Didn't see any problems, but didn't go into too much >>>> >>> depth >>> >>>> >>>> Record 86 >>>> XO 1.0 / Fedora 14 / Sugar 0.9 /Build 18 customised / Firmware Q2E45 >>>> XO 1.5 /Fedora 14 / Sugar 0.9 / Build 5 customized / Firmware Q3A58 >>>> Record 86 (tried to reproduce what was described here: >>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-October/028210.html >>>> ). >>>> >>> Couldn't >>> >>>> reproduce.But found some errors nonetheless: When recording a video, >>>> while recording works fine, after recording clicked the 'i' button >>>> (information/metadata?) and a big black window opens that cannon be >>>> closed. But loading an existing video, opens the black box, opening with >>>> 'start new' doesn't bring up the black box. Also, upon quitting the >>>> activity it is not asking to save, unless it was started as 'new'. It >>>> might be useful to be able to open 'new' from within the activity, not >>>> have to stop and star again to work on a new project. >>>> >>> >>> Record might have several issues, that is one of those that a developer >>> would need to look at imho. The request from Eric was a test on a 852 >>> (F11) build. So, I would not compare that with the F14 build. >>> >>> Thanks for testing, >>> Simon >>> >> > Yeah, I have seen it several times myself, and I thought at one point too > that it was due to unmounting, but then was not able to reproduce it > reliably :/ > > Regards, > Simon > -- M Fabiana Kubke Department of Anatomy | University of Auckland | New Zealand (+64) 9 373-7599 Ext 86002 | (+64)9 923 6002 (direct) | Mobile: (+64) 210 437 121 Skype: superfabs | http://twitter.com/Kubke | http://identi.ca/kubke | http://buildingblogsofscience.wordpress.com | http://sciblogs.co.nz/building-blogs-of-science | http://popscinz.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ Testing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
