On 6 October 2012 13:27, Walter Bender <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jerry Vonau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for testing. > > > > On 5 October 2012 23:47, Tom Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Auckland Testing Summary 29 September 2012 > >> Who: John, Oliver, Tabitha, Tom > >> Testing build 44 11.3.1-au > >> > >> XO-1.75: > >> Browse 192.3!! Rocking like it’s January 2010! > >> Based on Firefox 3.6.23, 5 security releases made since! > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_3.6#cite_note-41 > >> Crashes if you visit large image, previously reported as olpc #11569 > >> Google docs complains browser is out of date. > >> Can create google docs unlike latest Browse > >> Can open links in new tabs unlike latest Browse > >> It’s quite slow, get slow script warning on wikipedia! > > > > > > noted > > > >> > >> Somehow we managed to download a new webkit browse.xo and install it on > >> one laptop. This version of browse didn’t work at all. We got this > version > >> by downloading on an x86 laptop from a page with a big list of versions > >> (sorry, we don’t know exactly where). Shouldn’t the XO refuse to install > >> something that won’t actually work with it? > >> > > > > The new webkit based browse.xo is sugar 0.96 or greater, presently there > is > > no way to stop users from shooting themselves in the foot by installing a > > bundle that is not supported on their version of sugar. > > Hmm. I thought activities.sugarlabs.org was a bit smarter than that. > That said, the bundle could have come from elsewhere. > > Well it is if you use browse to view activities.sugarlabs.org, but I suspect the activity was downloaded to a usbkey on a different machine then auto installed by launching it from the usbkey. Think the real fix might run deep into sugar's inner workings, some discussion at http://sugardextrose.org/issues/1532 Jerry
_______________________________________________ Testing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
