Please pardon me if my
thought process is to simplistic, but here is my view on EDI claim
rejections:
EDI is an attempt to
automate and streamline a paper based process. In a paper based
system, if a provider mails 1000 billing forms (claims) to a
payer, the payer is only going to return correspondence on the forms that
have problems. The payer is not going to return all 1000 paper forms
(claims) because one of them is incorrect.
I see EDI the same way,
why return all 1000 claims because one of them is bad? As a patient,
I would hate to know that my claim has not been processed because
someone else's claim was coded wrong.... From the payer's
point of view, I would hate to go to court and explain to a judge that a
claim was not processed in a reasonable amount of time because another
claim in the batch was bad....
Anyway, that's my two cents, for what
is worth...
Dwayne E. Cecil Senior Consultant LANSA, Inc. tel. 865-376-3486 fax 865-376-3486 Did you know these public Web sites are built with LANSA?:
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
|
- RE: When is a claim a standard claim? Dwayne E. Cecil
- RE: When is a claim a standard claim? Draves, Jayne
- RE: When is a claim a standard claim? Arvinder Singh
