"Mark A. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Prabhu has definitely uncovered a bug, but changing the length of the > string isn't the right fix. That field should never be more than 24 > characters (including the terminating null character). > > I'm working on a fix. It looks like there's more than one thing > broken in asn_date().
Thanks for the quick reaction. May I ask about an approximate timeline for the fix? Perhaps you know that teTeX-3.0 is soon to be released (i.e. within the next one, two or three weeks, I guess). Maybe Thomas Esser is willing to coordinate somewhat with you. Alternatively, there might be some 3.0.1 minor release in a couple of months (just a guess), where the fix might go in if you don't have time at present. I'm Cc-ing the tetex beta list in order to notify them of the progress. Happy TeX'ing, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer