Frank Küster writes: > Maybe SYSTEXMF should be renamed to TEXMFSYSFONTS? > > Hm, which version of teTeX in Debian do you mean? For the 3.0 > packages, neither TEXMFVAR nor TEXMFSYSVAR will be in TEXMFSYS.
Ah, I see, there were some major changes after 2.99.7 that I haven't introduced into my texmf.cnf. I did not expect any changes and did not check for them. I will have a careful look into this. To be bold, this unbelievable flexibility confuses me. I am wondering what the plusses are to have a more complex texmf.cnf than say, for root CONFIG: /etc/texmf/ STATIC: /usr/share/texmf/ DYNAMIC: /var/lib/texmf/ and for users FONTS: /var/cache/fonts/ Then duplicate the lot for the user's $HOME directory. I have not yet, as a packager nor as user, felt the need for much more than that. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org