petr olsak wrote: > > Since I am not really maintaining teTeX any more, > > I am not going to fix your bug in teTeX. > > This is not _my bug_ in teTeX, this bug is a consequence of our bad > communication (i.e. communnication between T.E. and P.O.). I will try to > show here what I mean by a better communication:
i just updated the catalogue to change the licence for cstex (there are others still to do). i last updated the catalogue a few months ago, and missed the significance of license: GPL with appendix as applied to csplain in license.eng. i feel that that description is deeply confusing. the licence is *not* gpl, it's something based on gpl -- but very seriously different from gpl. apparently i got it right when i catalogued csplain. i have changed the licence entry in the catalogue to say "other" rather than gpl. this reflects the fact that we have no licence categories for randomly-hacked versions of standard licences. are there any others of your many contributions on ctan that i've mis-catalogued -- for example, enctex? it's obviously very important. i've got +++ licences for olsak's stuff: a2ac code128 csfonts cspsfonts ean ofs (cstex, csplain, enctex already checked) in my todo file just now. have i missed something on enctex?