> I'm not a licence expert, but I would say "very bad". It's an unusual licence for projects outside the TeX world; that alone is an incitement for legally-inclined people to ask to change it.
> Both Mozilla and OpenOffice (years ago) asked for relicencing all LPPL > patterns. Do we have a list of the affected patterns? All the patterns I see as LPPL on http://www.tug.org/tex-hyphen/#languages are included in Mozilla according to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/hyphens (I'll check the exact files they have later). The only one using the MPL as part of a double-, nay, triple-licence scheme under is Hungarian (ah, Hungarian!) We could probably run through the language list to make sure it's up-to-date, too. Arthur
