On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:28:08AM +0100, Luis Bernardo wrote:
> Thank you for bringing this up to our attention. I agree it doesn't make
> much sense our current conversion. I will work on a different solution,
> which I will confirm with you before I commit.
For what it's worth, I recommend dropping la-x-classic entirely, and
for mul-ethi, you could either use mul_Ethi if that's allowed in your
tagging scheme, or produce several identical files for the different
languages using the Ethiopic script; mostly Ge'ez [gez], Amharic [am],
Tigrinya [ti] and Tigre [tig] (but the patterns might not be that well
suited to Amharic according to discussions we've had).
Best,
Arthur
