Dear Arthur, Thanks for the quick reply. Keeping LPPL is fine, I was about to ask for it but thought that you would know better.
And thanks for the LibreOffice remark. I know that they have different patterns but have not looked into it. Maybe it is time to do it. Best, Georgi -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Reutenauer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 19 April 2016 15:08 To: Georgi Boshnakov Cc: Mojca Miklavec; About TeX hyphenation patterns. Subject: Re: [tex-hyphen] updating the license of language patterns Dear Georgi, Many thanks for your assent. I've just updated the file, see http://tug.org/svn/texhyphen/trunk/hyph-utf8/tex/generic/hyph-utf8/patterns/tex/hyph-bg.tex?revision=748&view=markup Note I've marked the file as available under either the LPPL or the MIT licence because we're trying to keep track of the different licences covering a file; sadly, we're having these licence discussions regularly and we find it better to explicit list the licences. I also noticed that LibreOffice has a different hyphenation pattern file for Bulgarian, for which you're not credited, but that contains a number of patterns that look suspiciously like yours. Would you be interested in investigating what the differences are? The file is at https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/tree/bg_BG/hyph_bg_BG.dic Best, Arthur
