On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 06:31:02PM -0700, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > I didn't yet check which licence you used, but would MIT be acceptable > (for the patterns at least) if that's not what you used already?
The licence is similar in terms but shorter in words to the X11 version of the MIT licences: This software may be used, modified, copied, distributed, and sold, both in source and binary form provided that the above copyright notice and these terms are retained. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without prior permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDES "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE. > Would users need to switch between different versions (years when certain > rules applied)? No. These versions exist for the benefit of future development (not by me, but by other people who have to learn). > * We are also switching to YAML, so maybe some additional delay may occur, > hopefully not too much. Don't worry about delays. Anton Zinoviev
