>> > But I would create a simple script in any programming language >> > (lua, ruby, python, ...) and generate two pattern files out of >> > it. >> >> Not necessary – the stuff is so simple, and the number of syllables >> is closed which means there won't be any changes except bug fixes. >> A simple search and replace did the job in a few minutes; see >> attached file. > > I still find it useful to have a level of abstraction, *in > particular* when the rules are really simple. This is what is done > in Turkish for example (it's not a complete set of patterns): [...]
Well, yes. If someone is going to do that work, I certainly won't object :-) BTW, here's the original program that creates the `word list' used to derive the patterns: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=cjk.git;a=tree;f=utils/pyhyphen Werner
