Producing a score that looks fine and producing a sound file that sounds fine are very different tasks. The main task of PMX is the first one: producing handily a beautiful score. The midi files produced by PMX are essentially useful to detect the eventual errors in the score by hearing.

So, I think you have to decide which aspect you want to privilege :
1) the quality of the score (what realises the measure 1)
2) or the quality of the sound file (what realises the measure 2)

In fact, PMX serves the first task and not the second one. The better solution is to use it for producing good score and to use another program to modificate manually the midi file got with PMX.

Here is my proposition for your example:

====================
2 1 2 4 2 4 0 -4
1 2 20 .02

bt
./
w100m
% tempo = 60
It60ipipi
%1 looks right, sounds badly
a82 ze+ .ea a e /
r8x3 c e [u ax3nf \tbu2\ c \def\tbu#1{\relax}\def\qb#1#2{\qs}\ c ] r4 /

%2 sounds right, looks badly (very differently)
% tempo = 60 * 1.5 = 90
It90
L2M
m12/1/12/16 a82d s a1d s e1d+ a8d e8d //
e83d s e1d s r1db r4db /
r1 [ c- e ] [u a c ] r r4d /
====================

Olivier


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis ! http://www.msn.fr/msger/default.asp

_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to