Luigi, from your analysis, I'm guessing if you put something like the
following TeX in the TeX source, somewhere before the \newmovement command,
it should alter the inputs to \newmovement like you want:
\let\nmt\newmovement\def\newmovement#1#2#3{\nmt{#1}0{#3}\let\newmovement\nmt
}
I think you know how to enter this as in-line TeX in the PMX file. I don't
know M-Tx well enough to tell you how to do that from the M-Tx file. This is
all untested. If you still have a problem, send me the MTx file you have or
a working excerpt.
--Don Simons
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Luigi
Cataldi
>Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 10:21 AM
>To: tex-music@tug.org
>Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Double thin bar when number of instruments changes
in
>MTX
>
>On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:47:45 +0200
>Dirk Laurie <dirk.lau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> M-Tx is not clever enough to recognize movement changes,
>> but totally relies on PMX. So the question is: can PMX do it?
>> I'm pretty sure there would be some TeX magic that can fool
>> PMX into doing what you want by temporarily redefining
>> certain macros.
>>
>
>Sometime ago Don found a good solution for this. The solution is already in
my
>example. But Unluckily if in the same place there is a movement break and a
changes
>of the nummber of instruments MTX places the Rd command where PMX can't
>recognise it. This is the problem. PMX insert in the tex resulting file the
command
>"\newmovement005" for double thin barline and "\newmovement015" for thin-
>thick line. I confess: I'm not so skilled to redefine the command and I
need someone
>that can help me.
>
>Luigi
>
>--
>Luigi Cataldi <luica...@gmail.com>
>
>-------------------------------
>TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
>If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
>http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
-------------------------------
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
