The horizontal problem is solvable, and is even mentioned in the manual:
"Sometimes the ending section's up-downness must be overridden; you will
know this is
so if the ending is shifted horizontally from its proper position by one
notehead width."
I put that fix in bar 1.
Evidently PMX has not learned how to recognize a multiplicity change at the
same time as a staff-jump. The first problem is to figure out the right TeX
code. If you try the obvious, inserting \nbbu1 right before the first note
command after the staff jump, the added crossbar comes out BELOW the
original one (bar 2). \nbbl1 doesn't help; it not only still comes out
below, but the start of the added bar is shifted to the right (bar 3). I did
figure out the ugly mess of code in bar 4, which does do the job. I'm not
sure whether I'll have time to build this into PMX before I retire, but at
least now you have a work-around.
--Don Simons
=========================
2 2 1 4 1 4 0 0
1 1 20 .04
bt
./
rp //
[ d83 ]j rb8 /
rb8 [ju e14 f ] //
rp /
% 1 voice, still no double beam
[ d83 ]j rb8 /
rb8 [j \nbbl1\ e14 f ] /
%
[ d83 ]j rb8 /
rb8 [j \nbbu1\ e14 f ] /
%
[l+13 d83 ]j rb8 /
rb8 [j \nbbl1\ e14 f ]
==========================
From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Andre Van
Ryckeghem
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 7:57 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive
Subject: [Tex-music] beam on 2 staves and 2 voices
Dear all,
I do not can get it right when i want beams on notes crossing 2 staves. When
i have only 1 voice/staff it looks better.
Also i expected a double beam on the last 2 notes. Perhaps i am doing
something wrong?
This is the example:
============
2 2 1 4 1 4 0 0
1 1 20 .04
bt
./
w100m
rp //
[ d83 ]j rb8 /
rb8 [j e14 f ] //
rp /
% 1 voice, still no double beam
[ d83 ]j rb8 /
rb8 [j e14 f ] /
%
================
Thanks for helping me,
Andre
-------------------------------
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
