Thanks for your comments, Karl. I trust that you and all regarded my comments as supportive. I certainly for one have found that the package can be coerced to work.
I wonder if some thing could be done to make packages more supportable. Could class files and styles be organized in some very consistent way to allow outsiders to work with them? -----Original Message----- From: Karl Berry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 4:56 PM To: Thompson,Paul; [email protected] Subject: Re: [tex4ht] Again biblatex one of the most complex he has ever examined I think I can safely say it is *the* most complex :). The source code to the engines, for instance, pales in comparison ... He is, as an outsider, trying to maintain it I am trying but (for the record) CVR is able to do much more than me, thankfully. We both very much want to be able to put together a new release and devote more time to it in general. Thanks to everyone writing about the biblatex-and-footnotes and other issues. It definitely helps. as a general issue, who will maintain these packages over time, as developers lose interest or die? It's been an issue since day one. They are free software. So if someone cares enough, they can come forward and take them over, perhaps under a new name. If no one cares that much, the pkgs will stay out there as they are. So it's a self-organizing process ... Best, Karl ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
