Michal Hoftich <michal....@gmail.com> writes: > I forwarded this conversation to David and he confirmed that `<mi > mathvariant="...">` should be used ...
Slightly different is this question: how should one write LaTeX math (user level) in order for text4ht, or some other LaTeX to HTML+MathML translator, to produce <mi mathvariant="normal">Hom</mi> ? For the purpose of this let's stipulate that 'Hom', relative to pmathml, is an indicator, not an operator. Part of my issue here is that I see pmathml's <mo> having a significantly narrower scope than LaTeX's (with amsmath) \operatorname. I don't see anything equivalent to <mi> in LaTeX, but inside math zones, with amsmath loaded so that \text{} is available, I think \mbox is a fair approximation to <mi>. -- Bill