Quoting Karl Berry (2016-06-09 23:20:55) > It seems to me that there is a difference between savetrees, which > simply makes no sense in HTML, and tcolorbox, which does. I don't think > Michal was advocating blanket application of blacklisting packages.
Sure, we only need to take care of packages which do something what cause tex4ht to fail as soon as they are loaded. It is usually because they redefine some LaTeX internals, which tex4ht tries to redefine as well and they clash each other. It in not the case too much often, usually conflicts can be fixed in .4ht files which are loaded after preamble end. > > In any case, a warning and log message about non-inclusion make sense to > me, so the non-inclusion is at least visible, not completely silent. > (Aside from absence of reading the savetrees.sty file ...) -k Yes, message to the log file in \:dontusepackage makes sense. Best, Michal