Michal, > Quoting Ulrike Fischer (2016-08-03 18:02:41) >> >> > There is quite a lot of unicode.4hf versions generated from >> > tex4ht-fonts-4hf.tex: >> >> Yes I know. I'm not wondering about this. >> >> But why do I have two in the iso8859/1/charset folder? >> >> Only "iso8859/1" has a "uni" subfolder in the charset folder with an >> additional unicode.4ht. >> >> E.g. compare in your list iso88859/1 with iso8859/2: >> >> 2 versions here: >> >> > tex4ht.dir/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/2/charset/unicode.4hf >> > tex4ht.dir/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/2/html/charset/unicode.4hf >> >> but 3 versions here: >> >> > tex4ht.dir/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/1/charset/uni/unicode.4hf >> ^^^ odd >> > tex4ht.dir/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/1/charset/unicode.4hf >> > tex4ht.dir/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/1/html/charset/unicode.4hf >>
> I don't really understand how tex4ht selects unicode.4hf files. On my > machine, it always selects the one in charset subdir, I don't even know > how it is possible to select one in another subdir. Surely with > tex4ht.env edit. Well the general principle easy. In the env-file there are blocks e.g. <symhtf> i/tex4ht/ht-fonts/symbol/! i/tex4ht/ht-fonts/unicode/! i/tex4ht/ht-fonts/ascii/! i/tex4ht/ht-fonts/alias/! </symhtf> and with the -c option you are chosing such a block. -cunihtf will use the <unihtf> block, and -csymhtf the <unihtf> block. The <default> block seem to be the fallback. The problem are the finer details, miktex seems to need two subfolder levels, while texlive seems to look only in the next subfolder. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ulrike Fischer mailto:ne...@nililand.de
