Re: [tex4ht] [bug #343] Package pdfpages

[Deimantas Galcius]

Hi Michal, you can set -verbose to convert to see  the options gs is invoked with. E.g.  $ convert -verbose dice.eps dice.png "gs" -q -dQUIET -dSAFER -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -dNOPROMPT -dMaxBitmap=500000000 -dAlignToPixels=0 -dGridFitTT=2 "-sDEVICE=pngalpha" -dTextAlphaBits=4 -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 "-r72x72" -g258x86  "-sOutputFile=/tmp/magick-I2x48Gk1-%08d" "-f/tmp/magick-pzBXXFR7" "-f/tmp/magick-b4unOKoe" /tmp/magick-I2x48Gk1-00000001 PNG 258x86 258x86+0+0 8-bit DirectClass 3.89KB 0.000u 0:00.000 dice.eps PS 258x86 258x86+0+0 16-bit DirectClass 3.89KB 0.000u 0:00.000 dice.eps=>dice.png PS 258x86 258x86+0+0 8-bit PseudoClass 14c 0.000u 0:00.00 regards, -- deimi On 12/09/2016 11:24 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: Hi Reinhard, yes, they seem to be the same: rungs.png PNG 595x842 595x842+0+0 8-bit sRGB 35.7KB 0.000u 0:00.009 convert.png PNG 595x842 595x842+0+0 8-bit sRGB 17.7KB 0.000u 0:00.000 It isn't so bad in this case, the rungs produced file that is just twice as big :) Used options: rungs -sDEVICE=pngalpha -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dFirstPage=1 -dLastPage=1 -sOutputFile=rungs.png sample.pdf Michal On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Reinhard Kotucha <reinhard.kotu...@web.de> wrote: On 2016-12-07 at 12:11:04 +0100, Michal Hoftich wrote: > thanks, rungs seems to work. Images produced by Imagemagick are > much smaller, but I guess this is not so big issue nowadays. Hi Michal, are the parameters (color depth an resolution) the same? You can retrieve some meta data with ImageMagick's identify(1). Regards, Reinhard -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112 Marschnerstr. 25 D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotu...@web.de ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- Deimantas