Here is summary table of performance. All on same latex file of about 500 pages.+---------------+---------------+----------+ |window/Miktex | WSL/TexLive | speed up | ----------+---------------+---------------+----------+ lualatex | 0m 9.4s | 1m 15s |7.5 times | ----------+---------------+---------------+----------+ make4ht | 5m 7s | 6m 12s |1.08 times| ----------+---------------+---------------+----------+
I forgot to add the draft option timing. On Virtual box it was real 2m6.559s user 1m16.150s sys 0m12.077s Most of time I was seeing dvilualatex using almost 90-100% of the CPU. On widows, same command using draft option, the timing was ---------------------------- G:\public_html\my_notes\ODE_algorithms>ptime.exe make4ht --shell-escape -ulm draft -a warning -f html5+join_colors -c nma_mathjax.cfg -e MAIN.mk4 index.tex "mathjax,htm,5,fn-in,notoc*,p-width,charset=utf-8,cut-fullname,nostyle" "-cunihtf -utf8" ptime 1.0 for Win32, Freeware - http://www.pc-tools.net/ Copyright(C) 2002, Jem Berkes <[email protected]> === make4ht --shell-escape -ulm draft -a warning -f html5+join_colors -c nma_mathjax.cfg -e MAIN.mk4 index.tex "mathjax,htm,5,fn-in,notoc*,p-width,charset=utf-8,cut-fullname,nostyle" "-cunihtf -utf8" === This is LuaTeX, Version 1.18.1 (MiKTeX 24.4) system commands enabled. Execution time: 126.038 s ------------------------------ Which is not much different than Virtual box. I wonder why lualatex is so much faster on windows than tex4ht. --Nasser
