Well, having candidates is a good thing. I am very pleased we have candidates willing to serve. TCMA board takes a great deal of time, energy, and work. Giving the members a chance to vote is also a good thing. If a person is not elected as board member, there is still much work to do, and all meetings are open (with the option of short private sessions). To not be voted a board member is not an awful thing -- lots involved and slots to fill as far as skills. We need more involvement, but constructive criticism is always welcome, David, so feel free to volunteer to help out in some capacity. We would welcome your assistance (and you have helped us in the past!).
The reason for not having 5 positions is that the current bylaws do not provide for that. Fairness is relative, and no matter what efforts are made, somebody thinks it is unfair. Thanks for the feedback, and feel free to vote. Linda On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, David <dlocklea...@gmail.com> wrote: > You asked for feedback. > > Here is your dilemma: You have 5 awesome really cool candidates for > 4 positions. Right ? Or did > I misunderstand that ? > > Why not just have 5 positions and be done with it and spare us from > all the frickin politics ? > > The election is biased and un-fair to begin with. It would be more > fair to flip a coin, or to > draw straws, etc. > > Since that is not going to happen, why not let the 5th candidate or > the one you are trying to week out, > serve as Apprentice Board Member or something to that effect, so that > at the next election > they won't look like Sarah Palin, if they choose to run again. > > David Locklear > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Visit our website: http://texascavers.com > To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com > For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com > >
