What's the point of insuring the camera under one's homeowner's policy? So I can get insurance to pay for the repairs next time it falls out of the car and breaks?
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Pete Lindsley <caverp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like it is now a caving camera (if it still works). Then either buy a > better cave camera (like one of the new waterproof Pentax cameras, my 4-year > old Pentax is a W-60), or upgrade your Canon to a newer one for probably > cheaper than the repair, or both, and then insure the cameras under an > itemized list attached to your home owners policy. > > - Pete > > On Aug 10, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Geary Schindel wrote: > > Folks, > > I have (had) a Canon EOS Rebel XT digital (8 mg) camera. The camera bag > rolled out of the car and fell on its head at convention and now the LCD > screen doesn’t function (the one with all the camera data, not the screen > which shows the picture). Lens works fine. So, is this thing worth > repairing considering there is probably a repair cost to tell me how much > more it will cost to repair or should I buy a new camera. If so, I was > thinking of just buying the same or similar body. Seems they have upgraded > it some and they now use SD cards which would be nice. Any thoughts on what > I should do. It has been a pretty good camera up until now. I certainly > don’t need any of the high end professional cameras but still like a SLR. > > Geary > > > > -- Lyndon Tiu --------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com