Hi Bill, and thanks. Steve mentioned a "cleaned up version". Here it is. Feel free to use it as a petition, as I mentioned to Steve. Carl... >> Having read the petition: >> >> Perhaps all who advocate the closure of caves without proving that it is >> spread by human traffic should adhere more closely to scientific method, >> including all BLM, Forest Service, and NPS officials who advocate only some >> cave closures, and the extremist scientists and litigation lawyers who >> advocate blanket closures and wrote the petition listed below. >> >> The petition does not show one bit of supportive scientific data regarding >> the spread by humans. To date during all of the posting I have read about >> WNS, there has not been one bit of data, i.e. a study or otherwise, >> presented to conclusively and without a doubt, show that WNS is indeed >> spread by human traffic into caves. This would involve studying caves were >> there has not been any human traffic, i.e. a control group or subject. >> >> First, it would involve making an observation, that there is WNS in caves, >> which has been done, then asking a question; how is is spreading?, which has >> also been done. A hypothesis is then formed, in this case, that further >> infection of caves by WNS could be spread by humans. This is the last step >> that has been taken to my knowledge so far. The next step is to do an >> experiment, using a control and a study group. At this point, everything >> falls flat. To my knowledge, there has not been one valid experiment to >> conclusively show that WNS is spread by humans. Further, after the >> experiment is done, the conclusions presented must be able to be duplicated >> with the same results. This again, has not been done to my knowledge. It is >> only after all of these steps are taken, in exact order, that conclusions >> and valid, supported decisions can be made regarding cave closures. >> >> As such, without the use of and adherence to scientific method to prove or >> disprove that humans are in part, spreading WNS, the closure of any cave is >> invalid. >> >> To be very blunt to all those who advocate the closure of caves, Prove the >> point, using valid scientific method. Until then the petition listed below >> is extremist, unsupported by any accompanying >> scientific data to prove or disprove that human traffic into caves is >> partially spreading WNS throughout U.S. caves. >> If the statements presented above are wrong, then prove them wrong, >> with valid, duplicated, supportive scientific data.
>> Carl Pagano.....Caver, 20+years Hospital based Health Care >> Professional, Albuquerque, New Mexico >> On May 28, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Bill Ellis wrote: > To all; > > Very well stated Carl. We have a real need to return to the scientific > method when considering data and making environmental policy decisions. > Making assumptions, having feel good knee jerk reactions and using models > does not yield the desired results in most cases. I'm still waiting for the > global warming extremists to use data not obtained by modeling to support > their arguments. Time to clean up the scientific act as well. > > Bill > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Carl Pagano > To: s...@caver.net > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 7:11 AM > Subject: Re: [SWR] WNS > > To all: > Having read the petition: By the time the lawyers line up, litigation takes > place, etc. the disease will either have already spread to the west, or we'll > have learned correctly that this petition is one of extremism, and that the > spread of WNS cannot be stopped by the blanket closure of caves. External > quarantine of cavers is easy. You cannot quarantine the bats living in the > caves. Why is it, that these "scientists" cannot understand this? Bats move, > just like people do, to better digs when they want to, incredibly, without > the aid of any humans including lawyers or scientists with as yet unproven > theories. > > Perhaps all who advocate the closure of caves without proving that it is > spread by cavers should, to paraphrase the expression, "Wake Up, and Smell > The Guano". This does include all BLM, Forest Service, and NPS officials who > advocate only some cave closures (God forbid Carlsbad is EVER closed as $$$ > are involved here), and the extremist scientists and litigation lawyers who > advocate blanket closures and wrote the petition listed below. > > The petition does not show one bit of supportive scientific data regarding > the spread by humans. To date during all of the posting on SWR about WNS, > there has not been one bit of data, i.e. a study or otherwise, presented to > conclusively and without a doubt, show that WNS is indeed spread by human > traffic into caves. This would involve studying caves were there has not been > any human traffic, i.e. a control group or subject. > > First, it would involve making an observation, that there is WNS in caves, > which has been done, then asking a question; how is is spreading?, which has > also been done. A hypothesis is then formed, in this case, that further > infection of caves by WNS could be spread by humans. This is the last step > that has been taken to my knowledge so far. The next step is to do an > experiment, using a control and a study group. At this point, everything > falls flat. To my knowledge, there has not been one valid experiment to > conclusively show that WNS is spread by humans. Further, after the experiment > is done, the conclusions presented must be able to be duplicated with the > same results. This again, has not been done to my knowledge. It is only after > all of these steps are taken, in exact order, that conclusions and valid, > supported decisions can be made regarding cave closures. > > As such, without the use of and adherence to scientific method to prove or > disprove that humans are in part, spreading WNS, the closure of any cave is > invalid. > > To be very blunt to all those who advocate the closure of caves, either put > up, or shut up. Prove the point, using valid scientific method. Until then > the petition listed below is extremist, unsupported by any > accompanying scientific data to prove or disprove that human traffic into > caves is partially spreading WNS throughout U.S. caves. > The unsupported petition in printed form is useful, but only for a camping > colonic emergency. > If the statements presented above are wrong, then prove them wrong, > with valid, duplicated, supportive scientific data, here, on the SWR website. > Carl..... > > On May 27, 2011, at 7:06 PM, aaronjst...@hotmail.com wrote: > >> I might be behind the times on this but this was brought to my attention >> today. Looks like the efforts put forth by the BLM that most cavers >> disagreed with were still not enough for the Center for Biological >> Diversity. Their website also specifically sites BLM's unwillingness to >> institute a blanket closure. >> >> http://www.caves.org/WNS/CBD%20Bat_APA_Petition_NOI_5-25-11.pdf >> >> Aaron >> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® >> _______________________________________________ >> SWR mailing list >> s...@caver.net >> http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > SWR mailing list > s...@caver.net > http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net
_______________________________________________ SWR mailing list s...@caver.net http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net