My oversight. You are right, you both did the hard part and completed the 
survey. Bad air yes, but it probably was much worse before we blew good air 
into the pit for an hour.

--- On Tue, 2/16/10, Andy Zenker <rockhugg...@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Andy Zenker <rockhugg...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Lemons Ranch Cave
To: texascavers@texascavers.com
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 10:39 AM


Actually, Matt Zaldivar and I surveyed the final depth of Lemon's Ranch.  Mark 
and Rafal recorded the data.  It was bad air, very muddy and a ton of fun!

Andy Zenker


On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Preston Forsythe <pns_...@bellsouth.net> wrote:




We were able to complete the survey by running 225 ft of 6" air duct down into 
the cave to blow out the high concentrations of CO 2.
 
Ye Gads..........hard core.
 
I have been down in one of those TX bad air pits and I back out quickly.
 
Preston in western KY
 
----------------------------------------




----- Original Message ----- 
From: mark gee 
To: texascavers@texascavers.com 
Cc: markageetxca...@yahoo.com 
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 1:19 PM
Subject: [Texascavers] Lemons Ranch Cave






Just wanted to make you cavers aware that a new map of Lemons Ranch is now 
finished and it will be at the TSA salone for viewing. The survey is complete 
now and the survey footage totals 949 ft. with a depth of 104 ft. This is the 
third deepest cave at the park I am told.  My thanks go to those who helped 
with the survey. They are : Will Harris, Ronnie Harrison, Rafal Kedzierski, Ed 
Spaulding, Scott Boyd, Bonnie Longley, Justin Menking, Kurt Menking, Kathleen 
O-Connor, Mark Sanders, and Jessica Stevenson. There are two dig leads at both 
ends of the cave but both are grim. Both are in bad air. We were able to 
complete the survey by running 225 ft of 6" air duct down into the cave to blow 
out the high concentrations of CO 2. We plan to survey other bad air caves as 
long as bats are not present in the caves. 
Happy Caving ! 




      

Reply via email to