Check out the National Climatic Data Center page for Speleothem (Cave Deposit) Data:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/speleothem.html

This is a repository of radiometric data from speleothems around the world, to be used for paleoclimatology.

Estimated ages range from a few thousand years before present (YrBP) to more than 100,000 YrBP.

Dating them provides a record of paleoclimate and an estimate of the earth's temperature.

Diana

On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:43 PM, John P Brooks wrote:

But if the earth is only 8 to 10,000 years old...why is the age of speleothems important? Does dating them prove that the cave existed before creation?

Geary Schindel wrote:
 Mark,

 Maybe one of the specialists in this area
will respond with more detailed information but yes, speleothems can be dated by analyzing the ratios of radioactive elements. They do have growth rings but the ones you see with the naked eye do not equate to dates like tree rings – it is a lot more complicated than that. In the past, ice cores have been used to determine atmospheric gas composition and estimates about climate back to approximately 100,000 years. I understand that the speleothem dating techniques can take the dating back almost 400,000 years with surprisingly good resolution (20+ years?) and are now becoming the gold standard for age dating and climate studies with microcrystalline growth rings being used to
estimate regional rainfall.  It is also much complicated than I’ve
described. Speleothems have the added advantage in that they occur almost anywhere there are caves so therefore, you can create a local data base of dates rather then depending upon ice cores which can only be obtained from high mountains or the Polar Regions . Dating of speleothems used to be a pretty arcane practice done by very few geologists/speleologists who were looking to answer specific questions such as whether speleothems continued to grow during ice ages which would imply that the area above the cave was ice free or to try and determine a relative minimum age for a cave passage. The techniques have become more refined and speleothems have now a hot field of study and have become a critical
piece of data to understand global climate change.

 Generally, the speleothem is cut in half
and rock specimens are removed along the axis of the speleothem and analyzed for their uranium thorium content through a process which involves a lot of complex chemistry using some fairly strong acids (needless to say, you can’t
do this at home with your rock tumbler).

 Regarding your comment about whether speleothems
should be removed for use in scientific interest. Well that depends – most scientists are very responsible about the removal of speleothems and would not recommend that prominent formations be removed and if a specimen needed to
be collected, that it be done so to minimize the impacts to a cave.
Removal should also only occur with permission of the owner.  Cave
formations are very nice to look at and the indiscriminate destruction of formations should certainly be discouraged. However, the removal of a few
formations for scientific use is considered by many scientists to be
acceptable.

 Note that cave sediments can also be used
for relative age dating and should not needlessly be disturbed, not only does an undisturbed floor look nice but the sediments may provide some important scientific
data.

 Formations have been removed from a number
of caves in Texas including Devils Sinkhole. The UT Geosciences Department has one of the better labs in the country and has published their results in a
number of scientific publications.

 Geary

 -----Original Message-----
 From: mark.al...@l-3com.com
[mailto:mark.al...@l-3com.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008
12:27 PM
 To: Allan Cobb; Texascavers
Mailing List
 Subject: RE: [Texascavers] Caving
Show on Discovery Channel

 Did anyone happen to
watch this show the other night?


 Were you as horrified as
I was when the overly dramatic host and another scientist took a chisel to an ~ 3 foot by 4 inch stalagmite in order to break it free in order to count the
rings?

 Apparently, they were
wanting to calculate the rate of annual water flow in order to match it up to
the apparent demise of the below mentioned headless skeleton.

 Their theory was that the
hapless victim was sacrificed at about the same time as a drought was occurring and, by doing so, the gods would be pleased with the sacrifice and send rain.

 How you could correlate
the age of the stalag with the victim's death is beyond me.

 Is this appropriate
behavior?

 I'm surprise no one else
hear saw this or thought to comment on it.


 Y'all's thoughts?


 Mark A.



 From: Allan Cobb [mailto:a...@oztotl.com]
 Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008
10:58 PM
 To: Texascavers Mailing List
 Subject: [Texascavers] Caving Show
on Discovery Channel
 Monday night (January 21) at 8 PM is
a new series called Bone Detectives. This episode is about a headless skeleton
in a cave in Belize.  The cave that the show centers around is called
Midnight Terror and it was only discovered about a year ago. The show
also did filming in several other caves in Belize.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Diana R. Tomchick
Associate Professor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Department of Biochemistry
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Rm. ND10.214B   
Dallas, TX 75390-8816, U.S.A.   
Email: diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu
214-645-6383 (phone)
214-645-6353 (fax)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com

Reply via email to