Yes, a few of those photos from Brazil are rather garish. In fact, though, in a couple of cases it looks like a less-edited version of the same scene is in the set. They also appear, as least on screen, to have been overly enthusiastically sharpened. Nevertheless, I've sent that URL on to Urs Widmer of Speleo Projects in case he wants to contact the photographer. I think several of the photos would qualify for the annual Caving Calendar from Switzerland. Presumably the photographer could submit unedited, or nearly so, original images for consideration.

The NSS Photo Salon does have a separate category for digital images. In fact, entries in that category are judged more strictly, on the theory that there's no excuse for defects in a photo that's been manipulated in a computer. I think most of the photos entered in the last couple of NSS salons have been digital, although I haven't really paid attention. I'm sure that's the case in the print salon, which I inspect during the convention. I use the Photo Salon night on Thursdays to stay in camp and let my liver regenerate, so I don't see the slides (or, I suppose I should say, the projected images).

The meaningful distinction these days, seems to me, ought to be not digital vs film, but "natural" vs something really offbeat, such as a montage or something that has been manipulated in an unrealistic way (say, using some special-effect filter or adding simulated lens flare). But I suppose it might be hard to decide where to draw the line. What computer manipulations are just improving a photograph, and what are creating something different?--Bill Mixon

----------------------------------------------
You may "reply" to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com

Reply via email to