Over the past few years, I have written opinions about LED lights for
camping
and caving.  I subtly mentioned in some of those post, how disappointed I
was with the advancement of LED
lanterns compared to headlamps and flashlights.      Meaning, there
was not an easy way back then to find an LED lantern made in the same
fashion as say,
a StenLight, or Scurion, or El Speleo, etc.

Please meet the latest contender:


https://target.scene7.com/is/image/Target/GUEST_6641df46-83a2-445b-b7a4-2008a9e0f4e8?wid=1400&fmt=webp

I just bought this at Target Store.

Here is my picture of it, along with some of my other LED lanterns, that I
have
used in past reviews.

     https://www.dropbox.com/s/yno8h2y8ngqls3i/LED%20Lanterns.jpg?dl=0

It is the red cylindrical one on the right.     All of the other lanterns
were purchased by me
at Walmart ( I think ).    There is a standard-size can of beans in the
middle
of the picture - for scale, and also a Ty beanie-baby bat - for scale ( the
large bat version ).
[ Disclaimer:    I have some other LED lanterns somewhere, and I have given
away several as door
prizes, or sold them at various caving events ]

This new LED lantern, claims it can put out 75 lumens for 200 hours on a set
of 4 D-size batteries.   It has two brighter modes, but I feel you would
seldom
use those.     What I believe are the unique features is that the heat-sink
on the LED
looks functional and there is a large frosted lens that is shaped like an
upside down golf-tee inside
of the normal transparent acrylic tube.     This seems to be
the right idea, that future lanterns should use as the bar.  I would guess
that the LED is a new efficient version,
compared to the other lanterns, based on the heat-sink.   ( I am hoping the
heat-sink is real and not
an imitation heat-sink )

The LED appears to be a single one firing downward toward a concave
reflector inside
the frosted lens.    I can only guess it is the kind you find in the 3 watt
LED flashlights, that
advertise 800 plus lumens.

So what is not to like:    They did not put a hook on the bottom of the
lantern.  This was so stupid.
If you hang this lantern with the top hook almost all the light is aiming
upward.     So you are more likely going to want to
place this lantern on the ground or on a low-table.   I see no easy way to
gerry-rig it to hang upside down.

What is great though, is that if you need to light up several camp-spots,
you can do that with
this small lantern - one that is only slightly larger than a 32 oz. bottle
of Gatorade, and about the
same weight.

Another drawback, is that if you drop this lantern ( especially with the
batteries in it ), it is going to
not be reparable.    I would recommend putting some duct-tape on it in
places to beef it up.

Coleman alleges, that you can leave it out in the rain.   I doubt that.
The switch is most likely going
to let water in and ruin the lantern.   I would recommend putting some kind
of tape over the switch
if you plan to leave it on outside the tent while you sleep.     ( This
lamp is way too bright for using
inside a tent ).

I would also recommend putting some foil around it so that light does not
go off in a direction that is
not necessary - annoying other campers.

This lamp is very stable on a flat surface and I am certain you could rig
some kind of ring around it
to make it even more stable.

If laid on its side, it will roll off the table and break.

It does not have a night-light feature or any kind of low lumen setting to
help you save battery power.
That is why I would recommend the lamp shown in my picture sitting on the
can of beans, for use inside
the tent.

This lantern is currently $ 30 plus tax, which is way too high.    Wait for
the price to drop or look for it on
sale somewhere.     Meanwhile, if you shop around, you can find a good
lantern for under $ 30.   The
Walmart that I was at today had a Bushnell lantern ( probably of better
quality ) for $ 30 plus tax.   I had
already purchased the lantern described above, so I skipped that purchase.

The specs allege the lantern has a battery guard to keep the batteries from
accidentally wasting juice.   I
don't know if it really does what it alleges to.

If you do decide to purchase this lantern, be careful, as there is a
slightly smaller version that only has
2 lower light settings.

If the lantern really does put out 75 lumens for 200 hours, and you used it
6 hours per night of camping, that
would be over a month of camping.

I would assume you could light up a large room in a cave with this lantern,
but there are probably now better
ways to do that.

Since the lantern is not rechargeable, that may play a role in your
decision to buy it.     For car-camping, a
rechargeable lantern comes in handy.     But if you were going on an
overnight hike, and wanted to scare off
the nocturnal animals, this lantern might do the trick.

I would bet that you could use a standard propane lantern-base with this
new lantern, but I have no way
to test that.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71rpX%2B7PJfL._SL1500_.jpg

When I was camping with my grandpa back in the late 60's and early 70's, he
used white-gas lanterns.
That is nostalgic now, to use those.     This new lantern is far more
practical than the white-gas lantern.

I guess if you were stranded in a winter-storm without a tent you would
prefer the white-gas lantern, but
what are you going to do when the fuel runs out ?

The advantage still with propane is that you can cook with the cylinder of
propane and use it in a heater.

I think there is no reason anymore to use a fluorescent lantern, unless you
have one that still works good.
If I still have some that work, I will likely give them away, or just use
them for decorations in my man-cave.

David

P.S.

There is still no word now from the person who is allegedly either in
hiding or missing that I was subtly trying
to find.     They seem to have no ties to cavers anymore.    The last two
cavers that allegedly helped that person seem
to allegedly deeply regret it.

I finished off a 25.3 ounce bottle of Fentiman's Ginger Beer while typing
this review.   I drink it straight, and
now prefer it to Dr. Pepper, as my only real bad habit.    Calling it a
beer, is probably not a good marketing
strategy.    It seems to be expensive in most places that carry it.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41IdEAVCgkL.jpg

I get it at BIG LOTS Store for $ 3.25 a bottle, and that usually makes 3 or
4 glasses.
_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers

Reply via email to