On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:32:05PM +0100, Joris van der Hoeven wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:53:06PM +0000, Sam Liddicott wrote: > > Forgive me if this has been discussed to death, but I haven't seen much > > discussion on it re:-) > > > > If you use git then people can sit on commits a bit longer before they have > > to push them. Less rushing and more testing means less bad commits.
One more thing about this issue: the main difference between SVN and GIT is that GIT would allow me to extract useful patches from a contributors GIT repository. If contributors have write access, then both SVN and GIT allow for erroneous commits. Now I do not want to _extract_ useful patches from contributors code. It is up to contributors to carefully _prepare_ patches that are as comprehensive as possible for me. Contributors who are sure about what they are doing may commit themselves. This does not withstand that _you_ may use GIT for maintaining a local copy and preparing your patches. Max maintains a GIT mirror for this. Best wishes, --Joris _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
