Those links show that many people (everyone?) find git superior to other version control systems, but I don't need any convincing there! Although I forget the arguments given, I watched some google talk about git some time ago which convinced me that it was more than worth a look. I somehow never got to it.
The question is however whether inter operation with svn is easy and smooth. A two-minute google search provides a resounding yes together with a list of git-svn commands, so I will probably be giving it a try next week when I have time again. Thanks! ________________ Miguel de Benito. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:48, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <alv...@minin.es>wrote: > Git (DVCS)[1] does[2] not[3] get[3] used[4] everywhere[5] by[6] chance[7]. > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/ > [2] http://git.kde.org > [3] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git > [4] https://github.com/clojure > [5] https://github.com/jquery > [6] http://qt.gitorious.org/qt > [7] http://gitorious.org/opensuse > [8] https://github.com/scipy/scipy > .... > > -á. > > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:34, Miguel de Benito Delgado > <m.debenit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > Am 16.03.2012 06:41 schrieb "Aleksandr Dobkin" <adob...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> What is nice about git is that you can maintain multiple branches of the > >> project and switch between them very quickly. Had you been using git, > think > >> you would have caught this error when you merged your work into the > master > >> branch and tried to compile. > > > > Thanks for the idea. So: I could constantly fetch the latest from the > main > > branch, commit locally as much as I wanted, then decide when to push it > back > > to main, right? And that way merging conflicts ought to happen seldom... > > because merging is a real PITA! > > > > And git to svn and back work well? Well, I guess I could look that up ;-) > > > > Thanks! > > > >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Miguel de Benito Delgado > >> <m.debenito.delg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> And... yep! it was yourself truly > > > > That would be of course, "yours truly". > > ___________________ > > Miguel de Benito. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Texmacs-dev mailing list > > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
