On 12 February 2013 12:17, Miguel de Benito Delgado <[email protected]> wrote:
> I use Parallels, which I find considerably superior to VirtualBox, under > MacOS at least. It's more stable, integrates perfectly with the system, has > "coherence" mode which is very handy, and many other things which just make > it better. It's not free, though. I haven't tried parallels. I was actually surprised by how well virtualbox works now. It used to be really slow - now it is quite workable. It has something like a coherence, but it sounds that parallel's is better. I put up a virtualbox image that runs TeXmacs+R (with syntax highlighting...) at https://mega.co.nz/#!dhlVhDjS!VcqY6klTTX9S9VJUyzNbTnwcuT99zYNCfXYFYbRTnGc And I also made some images that have different versions of R on them, so that I can get the interface working even on fairly old version of R (for now, I think 2.10 and older works ok) We could put up a collection of images like that for TeXmacs development.... > >> What is the best environment to compile/debug TeXmacs on windows? I'll >> try to also use a virtual machine on my mac for that… > > I think there are some instructions and some donwloadable bundle on the > website for this. I think Denis maintains it to work out of the box. > You mean this: http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/download/winqt.en.html Do you know if this is for win XP or win 7? Or maybe it doesn't matter.... Thanks! Michael _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
