Thanks, I was perhaps a little imprecise in my question but you gave me an answer on what I had in mind.
I really think that TeXmacs have great potential and should have been more commonly known. I have to take a closer look into the code and figure out how TeXmacs is built up. At some point maybe I can help with the development. Kristoffer > 9. sep. 2016 kl. 21.20 skrev Massimiliano Gubinelli <m.gubine...@gmail.com>: > > Dear Kristoffer, > > more or less all that need high speed like typesetting is coded in C++. I do > not understand what you mean by hardcoding, but if you have in mind some > modularity of the code, this is indeed present but not at the level of a > separate typesetting library. I’m experimenting a bit in a separate git > repository in ways of decouple more the typesetter/editor from the GUI stuff. > Maybe with some effort the typesetter could be extracted, but this is not in > the current development plans. Anyway the code is quite modular so it does > not seems impossible. > > Best > Max > > >> On 09 Sep 2016, at 16:17, Kristoffer Føllesdal <kfolles...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The algorithms and code that do the real time typesetting of the TeXmacs >> language is that hard coded into the TeXmacs software or is it a separate >> part? >> >> Had been nice if it was a separated package. It would then be easier to make >> for example a iOS application or another software for writing and reading >> TeXmacs documents in. >> >> Kristoffer K. Føllesdal >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Texmacs-dev mailing list >> Texmacs-dev@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
