Andrew Whitworth wrote: >>> 6) Math formulas are generally very well rendered and handled, >>> although integrals, limits and summations seem to be a bit cramped. >>> >> This should probably use the same renderer as we use for math images. >> Not sure why it wouldn't do so. Haven't added a bug for this as it's not >> clear to me what's going on or what needs to change. >> > > It looks to me (and I could definitely be wrong) like it's using the > "HTML if possible" rendering option, probably to save bandwidth on the > conversion server. > > Thanks for pointing out that issue.
For the book version formulas are rendered with latex, just as the Mediawiki does it. But there was one difference though, we always used the "math" (latex) environment. For formulas that appear on their own line we are now using the "displaymath" environment that does not cramp the formulas in the way you have seen it. --> Formulas should now look even nicer ;) I fixed this in the latex-writer (books), the downloadable pdf version already did the right thing. -- volker haas brainbot technologies ag fon +49 6131 2116394 boppstraße 64 fax +49 6131 2116392 55118 mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.brainbot.com/ _______________________________________________ Textbook-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
