On 9. Oct 2006, at 04:07, Mike Mellor wrote:
Adding to that, we also do not want to present them with too many
actions at once. The GTD2 bundle presents 11 items in its main
menu without separators or any grouping. So are these 11 items of
equal importance and all belong to the same group of actions?
Present a user with 11 ungrouped actions and he will remember
none, but give him just a few carefully chosen actions, and there
is a chance he will remember to use them.
I agree, but I don't remember how to split them out. I will try
and work on that.
Click just the bundle name in the bundle editor to edit the menu.
But back to the issue of multiple bundles: this new GTD2 bundle is
a new iteration of the old? Then let it replace the old! People
can still checkout the old version (feel free to tag it in the
repository) -- but if people really find the old one “better” then
maybe GTD2 needs some improvements.
I think that would work, but how hard is it for a user to get at an
older version in subversion?
As long as he know the revision of it (which he can find with svn
log), it is svn up -rNNNN GTD.tmbundle -- if you tag it, there is no
need for knowing the revision. So I would say it is trivial.
I'd hate to update my TM bundles one morning and find that all of
my files no longer worked. What I think would work (for me) would
be to keep them separate for a couple of weeks and then merge the
projects, based on user feedback. Does that work?
So you will remember it in a few weeks and give the GTD2 bundle a
better name? That would work.
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
