Sorry, I've been offline for about a week now so I missed the beginning of this. I am primarily responsible for the OCaml grammar, which has proven somewhat difficult to keep light in performance due to the terse nature of OCaml syntax. If I get a chance I will grab the two files you posted and look to see if there are any obvious places I can speed it up.
-David On 10/9/06, Benjamin Ylvisaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:15:28 +0200 Allan Odgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10. Oct 2006, at 02:14, Benjamin Ylvisaker wrote: > > >> 2.0 will have a somewhat faster parser, until then I am afraid your > >> only options are to simplify the OCaml grammar or buy a faster > >> machine ;) > > Before I dive into TextMate grammar hacking, what do you think the > > likelihood is that the OCaml grammar has some kind of performance bug > > that can be resolved easily? > > There is no performance bugs per se in the grammar. And also, the > parsing is asynchronous, so it is not the parsing itself which stalls > TextMate. > > Likely it is resolving scope selectors, this is done both when > building the function pop-up and when rendering the text. > > The first there is not much to do about, the second might improve if > you disable all the bundles you do not use (so less bundles provide > styles/preferences where the scope selector needs to be compared) -- > FYI what's actually slow here is using the system string class. I am > switching away from that, but not in the 1.5 branch (which is really > just for bug fixes). > > Could you btw let me know which machine you have? I have a 1.33 GHz PowerBook G4 with 1.25 GB of RAM. How does one disable bundles? Thanks, Benjamin _______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list textmate-dev@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
_______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list textmate-dev@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
