On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Chris Thomas wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:17 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
I really don't see a problem with listing one person as the
primary maintainer. We have three programmers at work, but we
always route contact for each project through one person. That
person passes the word along to one of the other programmers when
needed. That's just part of the job of the primary maintainer, in
my opinion.
I agree; the primary maintainer has the responsibility to delegate
support requests, and that's fine. One point of contact is
simplest. Might consider calling it "contact" rather than
"maintainer."
It might be a good idea to add a separate 'authors' field --
without direct email links -- so that everyone still gets credited.
Or maybe that info would be in the description. Or maybe it's just
too large a can of worms.
Chris
I vote for using a single "contact".
Leave the contributors list in subversion.
Maintainer is just too loaded.
thomas Aylott — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg — sixteenColors
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
