Extracts of RBI and seen in the Banking Regulation Act which I mentioned
which isa subject for me but a paper for a C A

Note; A person becoming so angry, must have observed the serenity of Grace
as addressed to TNCR in words of refute. And as I address mentioning his
name, a fair content writer must write to me direct or at least include my
email also , since the reply so enraged is only on account of me, which he
failed; and racing on I don’t normally do this or that is , jhis ind rights
and that does not lead him to indirectly observe as below par. Since the
simple nomination as trustee only and will is absolute ownership would have
ended if said YES. Tncr HAD NOT SAID ANYTHING DIFFERENT THAN MINE. Criminal
breach challenges were being avoided by the Banks by its own rules. That
does not mean, we cannot challenge the bank. Even now the banks have the
rights to transfer TO THE ACCOUNTS OF THE TRUSTEE ONLY. There is no
ownership. The joint account is also done only like that but there is the
ownership which the bank cannot challenge. But the court can stay the
operations of the nominee and the bank has to freeze.  In a Joint account
no one can freeze on any challenges. Hence only in the death of a partner
the ownership is dissolved. The joint account cannot be dissolved. AS A
MATTER OF FACT, THE LEGAL HEIR WHEN THEY ARE CHEATED BY THE NOMINEE,
WHETHER 3RD PARTY OR ONE OF THE LEGAL HEIRS, CAN STILL BRING THE BANK TO
PROSECUTION ALONG WITH THE rbi, FOR THE MISTAKE OF (ONLY IN THE LAST FEW
YEARS THEY HAD STARTED DOING IT; BEFORE NUMBER OF NOMINEES WITH % OF SHARE
CAN BE SPECIFIED) ASKING US TO GIVE ONLY ONE NAME, WHICH IS AGAINST THE
GENERAL LAW. As CBDT circulars are negativized by the courts, may be the
courts may direct compensations also, for forcing the bank and other
departmental clients-TO WRITE ONLY ONE NOMINEE WHILE THE RIGHTS OF
OWNERSHIP MAY BE DIFFERENT IN WILL.   The banks shall use its discrepancies
as having insisted only in one account transfer, to ease out its burden. No
one can escape from law, if argued well. The Allahabad HC decision is only
from that point of view on sending people from pillar to post; and only one
nomination is still cruel; and 3rt party is also worse.   Now more cases
will be filed. Had the learned simply ticked YES, there is no refuge
invited to defend. He said the bank will hand over and nothing against the
bank which is erroneous. The vicissitudes of law must be well comprehended.
Risk managers will see their gateway.  When people somehow want to express
their hatred, they fall into a deep pit. Para 13, 14 ,19, 20 and a few
lines more will be clear. Also whether nomination is welcome or better to
leave a will and take it across, except 3 states probate, must also be
thought. Instead “ivanukkuthaan ellam theriyum’ hatred will not help. Now
point blank extracts:  K Rajaram IRS 8623

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

*A nominee in banking terms refers to an account holder’s right to appoint
one or more persons who are entitled to receive the money in case of the
death of the account holder*
<https://www.axisbank.com/progress-with-us/money-matters/save-invest/why-you-should-have-a-nominee-for-your-bank-account>
. If there is a nominee, the bank will transfer the funds to the nominee/s
account without insisting on a court order, succession certificate or
letter of administration
<https://www.axisbank.com/progress-with-us/money-matters/save-invest/why-you-should-have-a-nominee-for-your-bank-account>
.*A nominee for a bank account needs to be on the following list*
<https://groww.in/banking/what-is-nominee-in-bank>:

   - An individual who the holder of the account trusts could be the
   nominee (it could be a member of his family, child, spouse, relative, and
   more).
   - If the nominee is not the legal heir, he or she will not be entitled
   to the funds.

*The nominee of a depositor in a bank does not get ownership of the money
in the account after death of the depositor*
<https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/nominee-of-bank-account-does-not-get-succession-rights-110111500030_1.html>
. The nominee gets exclusive right to receive the money lying in the account
<https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/nominee-of-bank-account-does-not-get-succession-rights-110111500030_1.html>
.

II   NOMINATION FACILITY IN BANK ACCOUNTS

Nomination is the right conferred upon the holder of a bank account to
appoint one or more persons who will be entitled to receive monies upon the
death of the account holder. In the event of death of an account or locker
holder, the bank can release the account proceeds or contents to the
nominee without insisting upon a succession certificate, letter of
administration or court order.

*Nomination Facility: *The Banking Regulation Act, 1949 was amended by
Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983 by introducing new Sections 45ZA to
45ZF, which provide, inter alia, for the following matters:

1.   To enable a banking company to make payment to the nominee of a
deceased depositor, the amount standing to the credit of the depositor.

2.   To enable a banking company to return the articles left by a deceased
person in its safe custody to his nominee, after making an inventory of the
articles in the manner directed by the Reserve Bank.

3.   To enable a banking company to release the contents of a safety locker
to the nominee of the hired of such locker, in the event of the death of
the hired, after making an inventory of the contents of the safety locker
in the manner directed by the Reserve Bank.

*Benefit of nomination: *The benefit of nomination is that in the event of
death of an account holder(s) or locker holder(s), the Bank can release the
account proceeds or contents of the locker to the nominee(s) without
insisting upon a Succession Certificate, Letter of Administration or Court
Order. The nominee holds the monies in the capacity of a Trustee on behalf
of the legal heirs of the deceased account holder(s) or locker holder(s)
and the Bank’s liability is duly discharged on payment to the Nominee.

*Who can nominate?*

1.   Bank account holders having deposit accounts in their individual names
or in joint names of two or more individuals can appoint a nominee to their
accounts.

2.   A sole proprietor can appoint a nominee to the sole proprietorship
account with the bank.

3.   In the case of a deposit account in the name of a minor, nomination
shall be made by a person lawfully entitled to act on behalf of the minor
in respect of a deposit account.

4.   Safe deposit locker holder(s) can appoint nominee(s) on their safe
deposit locker(s).

5.   A nomination can be made only in respect of a deposit account which is
held in the individual capacity of the depositor, and not in any
representative capacity such as the holder of an office like Director of a
Company, Secretary of an Association, Partner of a firm, or Karta of an HUF.

*The Banking Companies (Nomination) Rules, 1985*: Since such nomination has
to be made in the prescribed manner, the Central Government framed, in
consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, the Banking Companies
(Nomination) Rules, 1985. These Rules, together with the provision of new
Sections 45ZA to 45ZF of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 regarding
nomination facilities were brought into force with effect from 1985.

The Banking Companies (Nomination) Rules, 1985 which are self-explanatory,
provide for:-

1.           Nomination Forms for deposit accounts, articles kept in safe
custody and contents of safety lockers.

2.           Forms for cancellation and variation of the nominations.

3.           Registration of Nominations and cancellation and variation of
nominations, and matters related to the above.

*NOMINATION IS MENTION IN FOLLOWING SECTION OF BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949*

*Particulars*

*Acceptance of Nomination*

*Pay/Deliver only to Nominees*

Deposits

Section 45  ZA

Section  45  ZB

Safe Custody

Section  45  ZC

Section  45  ZD

Safe  Deposit Lockers

Section  45  ZE

Section  45  ZF

*Nomination facilities in respect of safe deposit locker / safe custody
articles: *Sections 45ZC to 45ZF of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949
provide for nomination and release of contents of safety lockers / safe
custody article to the nominee and protection against notice of claims of
other persons.

*Nomination Facility – Sole Proprietary Concern: *Banks may extend the
nomination facility also in respect of deposits held in the name of a sole
proprietary concern.

*Nomination Facility in Single Deposit Accounts: *Banks should give wide
publicity and provide guidance to deposit account holders on the benefits
of nomination facility and the survivor clause. Despite the best efforts in
this regard, banks might still be opening single deposit accounts without
nomination.

In a case which came up before the Allahabad High Court, the Honourable
Court has observed that “it will be most appropriate that the Reserve Bank
of India issues guidelines to the effect that no Savings Account or Fixed
Deposit in single name be accepted unless name of the nominee is given by
the depositors. It will go a long way to serve the purpose of the innocent
widows and children, who are dragged on long drawn proceedings in the Court
for claiming the amount, which lawfully belongs to them”.

Keeping in view the above, banks should generally insist that the person
opening a deposit account makes a nomination. In case the person opening an
account declines to fill in nomination, the bank should explain the
advantages of nomination facility. If the person opening the account still
does not want to nominate, the bank should ask him to give a specific
letter to the effect that he does not want to make a nomination. In case
the person opening the account declines to give such a letter, the bank
should record the fact on the account opening form and proceed with opening
of the account if otherwise found eligible. Under no circumstances, a bank
should refuse to open an account solely on the ground that the person
opening the account refused to nominate.

*VARIOUS NOMINATION FORMS*

*Account*

*Registration*

*Cancellation*

*Variation*

*DEPOSITS*

*DA 1*

*DA 2*

*DA 3*

*SAFE CUSTODY*

*SC 1*

*SC 2*

*SC 3*

*SAFE DEPOSIT LOCKER*

*SL 1 or SL 1A  (JOINT A/C)*

*SL 2*

*SL 3 or SL 3A*

*Acknowledgement of Nomination: *Banks should strictly comply with the
provisions of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Banking Companies
(Nomination) Rules, 1985 and devise a proper system of acknowledging the
receipt of the duly completed form of nomination, cancellation and / or
variation of the nomination. Such acknowledgement should be given to all
the customers irrespective of whether the same is demanded by the customers.

*Registering the nomination: *In terms of Rules 2 (10), 3 (9) and 4 (10) of
the Banking Companies (Nomination) Rules, 1985 banks are required to
register in its books the nomination, cancellation and / or variation of
the nomination. The banks should accordingly take action to register
nominations or changes therein, if any, made by their depositor(s) / hirers.

*Incorporation of the legend “Nomination Registered” in pass book, deposit
receipt etc. and indicating the Name of the Nominee in Pass Books / Fixed
Deposit Receipts: *When a bank account holder has availed himself of
nomination facility, the same may be indicated on the passbook so that, in
case of death of the account holder, his relatives can know from the pass
book that the nomination facility has been availed of by the deceased
depositor and take suitable action. Banks may, therefore, introduce the
practice of recording on the face of the passbook the position regarding
availment of nomination facility with the legend “Nomination Registered”.
This may be done in the case of term deposit receipts also.

Further, banks are advised that in addition to the legend “Nomination
Registered”, they should also indicate the name of the Nominee in the Pass
Books / Statement of Accounts / FDRs, *in case the customer is agreeable to
the same*.

*Separate nomination for savings bank account and pension account: *Nomination
facility is available for Savings Bank Account opened for credit of
pension. Banking Companies (Nomination) Rules, 1985 are distinct from the
Arrears of Pension (Nomination) Rules, 1983 and nomination exercised by the
pensioner under the latter rules for receipt of arrears of pension will not
be valid for the purpose of deposit accounts held by the pensioners with
banks for which a separate nomination is necessary in terms of the Banking
Companies (Nomination) Rules, 1985 in case a pensioner desires to avail of
nomination facility.

*Nomination facility in respect of deposits*

(i) Nomination facility is intended for individuals including a sole
proprietary concern.

(ii) Rules stipulate that nomination shall be made only in favour of
individuals. As such, a nominee cannot be an Association, Trust, Society or
any other Organisation or any office-bearer thereof in his official
capacity. In view thereof any nomination other than in favour of an
individual will not be valid.

(iii) There cannot be more than one nominee in respect of a joint deposit
account.

(iv) Banks may allow variation/cancellation of a subsisting nomination by
all the surviving depositor(s) acting together. This is also applicable to
deposits having operating instructions “either or survivor”.

(v) In the case of a joint deposit account the nominee’s right arises only
after the death of all the depositors.

*Witness in Nomination Forms:*  In this connection, we clarify that for the
various Forms prescribed under Rules, only Thumb-impression(s) shall be
attested by two witnesses. Signatures of the account holders need not be
attested by witnesses.

*Nomination in case of Joint Deposit Accounts:* It is understood that
sometimes the customers opening joint accounts with or without “Either or
Survivor” mandate, are dissuaded from exercising the nomination facility.
It is clarified that nomination facility is available for joint deposit
accounts also. Banks are, therefore, advised to ensure that their branches
offer nomination facility to all deposit accounts including joint accounts
opened by the customers.

*Nomination in Safe Deposit Lockers / Safe Custody Articles:*

(i) Nomination facilities are available only in the case of individual
depositors and not in respect of persons jointly depositing articles for
safe custody.

(ii) Section 45ZE of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 does not preclude a
minor from being a nominee for obtaining delivery of the contents of a
locker. However, the responsibility of the banks in such cases is to ensure
that when the contents of a locker were sought to be removed on behalf of
the minor nominee, the articles were handed over to a person who, in law,
was competent to receive the articles on behalf of the minor.

(iii) As regards lockers hired jointly, on the death of any one of the
joint hirers, the contents of the locker are only allowed to be removed
jointly by the nominees and the survivor(s) after an inventory was taken in
the prescribed manner. In such a case, after such removal preceded by an
inventory, the nominee and surviving hirer(s) may still keep the entire
contents with the same bank, if they so desire, by entering into a fresh
contract of hiring a locker.

K RAJARAM  IRS 8 6 23

On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 09:40, SRIRAMAJAYAM <[email protected]> wrote:

> The banker, expected to be more prudent in his transactions though stand
> discharged by paying the nominee would prefer to wait and act.
> The banker is guided by his house rules.
> 🙏🙏
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun, 2023, 9:38 am 'N Sekar' via iyer123, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am forwarding the Chart I received from Sri T N C R.
>>
>> *My  note:* Note the chart says banks will handover the amount to
>> nominees; my understanding after my discussions with my bank (last year) is
>> they will give the amounts to the Nominees UNESS they are restrained from
>> doing so by the competent authorities. If the legal heirs don't want it (if
>> they are not the nominees), then they can approach the courts but banks are
>> not liable if they handover the amounts to the nominees in the absence of
>> any restraining orders).
>>
>>
>> N Sekar
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Thatha_Patty" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CABHnVYKp3UAufDabAnqss_A__z93M7JNCr%2BOQA9yVOE-gc4eLQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CABHnVYKp3UAufDabAnqss_A__z93M7JNCr%2BOQA9yVOE-gc4eLQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "iyer123" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2121189671.1069918.1686197314678%40mail.yahoo.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2121189671.1069918.1686197314678%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAPpJEvqz8mDJTJrtAupUijKaRCnTPQrtFGJ%2BsJpGz0vsTiHgXA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAPpJEvqz8mDJTJrtAupUijKaRCnTPQrtFGJ%2BsJpGz0vsTiHgXA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopVrwua%3DQ2MXJTK_p2xixX%3DnJznmSrO8Adf32NJgd0v_A%40mail.gmail.com.
  • [no subject] Kannan Bargavan
    • Re: [iyer123] Fw: will Rajaram Krishnamurthy

Reply via email to