Sure colLaxminarayansarmaji. However issues I have told already do crop up
when punches are formed by yourself. Do exclaim your friends by name; but
writing Nethas etc do not point to them. So write boldly and take it back .
What you pay so you receive sir. I never start anything but I do not allow
weeds to grow under my feet. Even now you have not stated why seeking annas
,on a certain topic, remained silent even after seeing a part reply. So
whereas the letters say neutral, punches are passed with favouritism. As
long as you treat it as strict business I do not bother . So be may it be
Whether Queen or King English sir Thank you KR IRS 18 823

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 11:39, Laxminarayan Sarma <
laxminarayan.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> KR-ji  , you've now turned your guns at me. Never mind. I shall take every
> whiplash from a lesrned, senior scholar like  you as a lesson, a blessing.
>
> But, with due respect, my knowledge of and command over the Queen's
> English (now King's English), as compared to yours,  is rudimentary, almost
> non-existent. As to my felicity with the keyboard of my Android, it is
> lousy. Yiu will definitely appreciate that a hand that has wielded guns,
> cannot be as delicate and supple as the one that has wielded high-end
> pens...so it's obvious that I'm guilty of typos.
>
> *But i take care of one thing: spelling of names. The biggest indignity,
> disrespect and insult you can inflict on a man is mis-spelling his name.
>
> You're an erudite scholar treading the path of brahma shastras; not an
> ordinary, uncouth, barely educated like me. Would respectfully suggest if
> you please spare a few precious seconds of your precious time, you will
> notice that i spell my surname *WITHOUT* an *H *! It is soelt *S-A-R-M-A
> NOT *  S-*H*-A-R-M-A
>
> *I sincerely trust you will kindly condescend to do me a great favour by
> spelling my name correctly in your highly erudite scholarly treatisez that
> you so obligingly post in the forum for the enlightment, education,
> edification and, at times, entertainment of lesser mortals like this most
> humble servant of yours*
>
> *Col. Laxminarayan SaRMA*
>
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 10:10 am Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am ADDRESSING THIS IN RESPONSE TO LAKSHMINARAYANA SHARMAJI's satvika
>> request. I ack but Mr Sharmaji are you doing this unilaterally or
>> bilaterally? Impartially or partially?  Is it because having read the whole
>> episodes , right from the beginning, you felt your Annas are so honest
>> purushas who are insulted by me or you feel that they can do anything but I
>> have to remain silent? Than nenjarivadhu poyyarkka. When you wrote "NETAs
>> should you not remember it does apply to you also sir? So if I write a 3rd
>> rate material, keemayanam of Annadurai, will you all reply calmly without
>> getting incited? Do not be smart as smarthas are long dead. Non-Niyathas
>> cannot comment about the nethas. Do not worship humans; what bhagavatam
>> speaks about how one dwija shaall react is: Mata pita guru deivam are
>> worshipful; but throw them off if they go against the dharma and Vedas.  If
>> you refer you will find it by yourself. If you refer to your email when
>> you wrote :"netha", can you spell properly the few words you wrote there?
>>  I am not at all jibing at you sir; I ignored them as it is common for all;
>> but here I brought iti to your attention to explain the fellow to whom you
>> are trying to defend here, writes such nonsense jibings but gets wild when
>> cornered as his level is shallow, but I cannot pass as someone shall act as
>> police or else thieves will plunder. Why did he not write about your wrong
>> spellings?; because you are GOD? ; NO ; pancha tantra; even at 79 and 97.
>> If your 88 wants to join them pl do so but be prepared to share the booty
>> sir. You wrote one similar to your anna and what you got back and went
>> silent. One who knows that he does not know is better. If you would like
>> the relationship of Moodan and moorgan and the crocodiles as close, please
>> have them and have a taste . But unless you are neutral and courageous
>> enough to shut out all fronts please do not disturb annas. Have courage to
>> fight then you are a Brahmin. Or else  think so and lead your life in
>> silence. Thank you sir KR IRS 18 8 23
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 22:01, Laxminarayan Sarma <
>> laxminarayan.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear RK , Loved your write-up. You write well .But would it be too much
>>> to ask far if i request you to kindly confine to the subject . Not detract
>>> from it by bringing in references to anybody. And, for heaven's sake,
>>> please stop being disrespectful toeards  the venerable 97 year old
>>> gentleman..It goes against the tenets of Sanatana Dharma. The elderly
>>> gentleman is a Father Figure to most of us, seen and experienced more of
>>> the world. Regardless of snything, I would take it in my stride every
>>> uttersnce of such an elderly gentleman as a blessing. That is what my
>>> ancestors, my elders and my peers have yaught me. And i always abide by
>>> what i have imbibed as part of my upbringing and culture.
>>>
>>> So, sir, kindly hold your horses.. Words spoken in haste will cause us
>>> to repent at leisure.
>>>
>>> With respectful regards
>>>
>>> Laxminarayan
>>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Aug, 2023, 6:33 pm 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123, <
>>> iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Respected Mr Rajaram,
>>>>
>>>> You may have hatred and anger, show it to your family members, not on
>>>> me.
>>>>
>>>> It would not take much time to call you an idiot and fool.
>>>>
>>>> But my culture does not permit to  call you so. *You have no culture
>>>> at all. You are unfit to be called a former IRS. *
>>>>
>>>> *Next time you get anger show it your family members*. They will
>>>> retard to you, at least ten times you are using including your grand kids.
>>>>
>>>> There is an upper limit to one's patience. Are you not ashamed to lower
>>>> down to call another idiot and fool? Shame on you.
>>>>
>>>> Gopalakrishan
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 17 August, 2023 at 01:33:57 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As usual when Gopalakrishnan blabbers, and Narayanasamy naragal abuses
>>>> without any knowledge of the subject, they will write either one to one or
>>>> within iyer 123 with few members, out of which a few in conglomeration of
>>>> their out focussed company. Gopalakrishnan always floundered down below the
>>>> earth as he knew the route very well as he alone distinguished where is
>>>> earth and where is hell south etc.  That Gopalkrishna fool of an Ass did
>>>> not understand, whether nachiketa going to hell is written by Narayanasamy
>>>> or myself. That senile idiot of Singapore at 97 cannot distinguish the
>>>> foreign on earth and the rest travel in space. For that Kid anything
>>>> outside his bed is foreign so maybe it is. Hello Gopala, I know your
>>>> knowledge is shallow. But your write up below south etc you should have
>>>> learnt better. Where is the earth? Below Moon or SUN? Gopalakrishnan this
>>>> map is for you ; find out up or down this earth where you live before going
>>>> to foreign[below the earth]:
>>>>
>>>> Do you know directions in space? [image: image.png]
>>>>          Kathopanishad etymology
>>>>
>>>> Katha (Sanskrit: कठ) literally means "distress". Katha is also the
>>>> name of a sage, credited as the founder of a branch of the Krishna
>>>> Yajur-veda, as well as the term for a female pupil or follower of Kathas
>>>> school of Yajurveda. Katha Upanishad uses words that symbolically embed and
>>>> creatively have multiple meanings. For example, a closely pronounced word
>>>> *Katha* (Sanskrit: कथा) literally means "story, legend, conversation,
>>>> speech, tale" All of these related meanings are relevant to the Katha
>>>> Upanishad.
>>>>
>>>> Nachiketa, the boy and a central character in the Katha Upanishad
>>>> legend, similarly, has closely related words with roots and meanings
>>>> relevant to the text. The language Sanskrit,  suggests *Na- kṣiti* and *Na-
>>>> aksiyete*, which are word plays of and pronounced similar to
>>>> Nachiketa, means "non-decay, or what does not decay", a meaning that is
>>>> relevant to second boon portion of the Nachiketa story. Similarly, *Na-
>>>> jiti* is another word play and means "that which cannot be
>>>> vanquished", which is contextually relevant to the Nachiketa's third
>>>> boon. Another variation to Nachiketa, with etymological roots that is
>>>> relevant to Katha Upanishad: the word *Na-ciketa* also means "I do not
>>>> know, or he does not know". Some of these Sanskrit word plays are
>>>> incorporated within the Upanishads text.
>>>>
>>>> Like Taittiriya Upanishad of Yajurveda, each section of the Katha
>>>> Upanishad is called a *Valli* (वल्ली), which literally means a
>>>> medicinal vine <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vine>-like climbing plant
>>>> that grows independently yet is attached to a main tree. This symbolic
>>>> terminology is apt and likely reflects the root and nature of the
>>>> Upanishads in Black Yajur Veda, which too is largely independent of the
>>>> liturgical Yajur Veda, and is attached to the main text. THUS, HOW THE
>>>> ELDERS INTERPRETED KATHOPANISHAD CAN BE SEEN FROM BANARSIDAS PUBLICATIONS.
>>>> Out of wits in foreign land and those who think up and down to earth are
>>>> foreign, will learn how a foreign mind can think from the elders’’ notes.
>>>>
>>>>           The Upanishad opens with the story of Vajasravasa, also
>>>> called *Aruni Auddalaki Gautama*, who gives away all his worldly
>>>> possessions. However, his son Nachiketa (Sanskrit: नचिकेता) sees the 
>>>> charitable
>>>> sacrifice as a farce, because all those worldly things have already
>>>> been used to exhaustion, and are of no value to the recipients. The cows
>>>> given away, for example, were so old that they had 'drank-their-last-water'
>>>> (पीतोदकाः), 'eaten-their-last-grass' (जग्धतृणाः), 'don't give milk' (
>>>> दुग्धदोहाः), 'who are barren' (निरिन्द्रियाः). {KR All these words fit
>>>> those think interpreting foreigners} [peethodaga, jagatthruna, nirindriya
>>>> etc] Concerned, the son asks his father,
>>>>
>>>> "Dear father, to whom will you give me away?"
>>>> He said it a second, and then a third time.
>>>> The father, seized by anger, replied: "To Death, I give you away."
>>>>
>>>> — Nachiketa, Katha Upanishad, 1.1.1-1.1.4
>>>> [image: image.png][image: image.png]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>
>>>> Kasmai mam dasyaSEETHI? IS THE QUESTION OF Nachiketa.
>>>>
>>>> Mrthyeva tva datam iti.
>>>>
>>>>  HE IS GIVEN AS DATHAM BY FATHER TO YAMA; MEANING AS ANOTHER DEAD WOOD
>>>> AS NACHIKETA THOUGHT THAT HIS FATHER IS GIVING AS GIFT ALL OLD USED
>>>> ARTICLES. NACHIKETA DID NOT GO TO A FOREIGN AS DEFINED BY THE N AND G FOR 
>>>> COMMERCIAL
>>>> PURPOSE; HE WAS THROWN OUT AS OLD ARTICLE AS GIFT BY HIS FATHER.
>>>>
>>>>       So karka kasadara and then write K R IRS 17 8 23
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 11:45, gopala krishnan <gopa4...@yahoo.in>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Respected sir,
>>>>
>>>> On 15th August when he wrote Too my friends, and when I pointed out
>>>> that it must be to , Mr Rajaram  gave justification for using Too in his
>>>> response.Similarly  for use of lose instead of lost he will respond with 
>>>> *justification
>>>> for using lose*.
>>>>
>>>> "travelling through *space *from bhoolokam to yamalokam?" - he has
>>>> wrote. As per  concept in Hinduism I understand Yamalokam is beneath the
>>>> bhoolokam, how it will be above bhoolokam to travel through space?
>>>>
>>>> "Naraka (Sanskrit: नरक), also called Yamaloka, is the Hindu equivalent
>>>> of Hell, where sinners are tormented after death. It is also the abode of
>>>> Yama, the god of Death. It is described as located *in the south of
>>>> the universe and beneath the earth*" as per *google search*
>>>>
>>>> How space comes to the picture?
>>>>
>>>> Gopalakrishnan.
>>>>
>>>> In addition some abusing as response to your questions.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 17 August, 2023 at 11:11:44 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
>>>> iyern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear folks
>>>>
>>>> According to his own flawed reasoning:-
>>>>
>>>> (1) did Nachiketass "lose caste" (whatever that idiotic phrase might
>>>> mean) by travelling through space from bhoolokam to yamalokam?
>>>>
>>>> (2) did reprobate renegade blasphemer and unschooled uneducated
>>>> master-fibber K RAJARAM  ex-IRS 16 8 23 "lose caste" similarly by
>>>> travelling from India to Californuia, USA, and "lose caste" again
>>>> irretrievably by travelling to Hawaii?
>>>>
>>>> Can he honestly and without prevarication, evasion and lying answer the
>>>> following questions:-
>>>>
>>>> (3) was he ever of the braahmana "caste" since he never underwent any
>>>> of our samskaarams including jaatha karmam, naama karanam, anna-praashanam,
>>>> chaulam, ear-piercimg, aayushya-homam, upanayanam, vivaaham?
>>>>
>>>> (4) did he or did he not condemn, despise, denigrate, insult, discredit
>>>> all vaadhyaars without whom he could not have any of these
>>>> samskaarams performed?
>>>>
>>>> (5) has he ever heard of the kriya called the vichinnaagni santhaanam?
>>>>
>>>> (6) does he know why, by whom, and how it is performed?
>>>>
>>>> (7) did he marry according to the rules prescribed for Brahmins and
>>>> Hindus, involving the sapthapadi circumambulation of the agni, or did he do
>>>> a prosaic civil act before a government officer such as an assistant
>>>> registrar or a registrar and proceed to consummation?
>>>>
>>>> (8) does he know what is the "naandi" ritual performed before
>>>> upanayanam, vivaaham, shraaddham, shashti-abda-poorthi, and sathabhishekam?
>>>>
>>>> (9) does he know by whom and for whom and why is it performed?
>>>>
>>>> (10) does he know what is agnihothram?
>>>>
>>>> (11) if so, which has he performed, and on what occasion?
>>>>
>>>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:42 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Section IX - Meditation on the Vaisvanavara Fire
>>>>
>>>> Chapter V
>>>> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-brihadaranyaka-upanishad/d/doc122185.html>
>>>>  *Verse
>>>> 5.9.1: Brahadaranyaka Upanishad*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Kathopanishad Vaishvanaram verse of Nachiketa speaks about the yagnam
>>>> the Vedic must perform, connecting his soul to the fire agni @
>>>> Vaisnavara=human Agni. Vedam oduvarrkku ore mazhai means the strict vediyar
>>>> addicted to being a Brahmin. The Vaishvanaran who begets th fire on the
>>>> Brahma yagnam, must preserve it till death when his atman gets purified by
>>>> that Agni. Hence Crossing the ocean is prohibited for the tri varnas and
>>>> especially to the true Brahmin.
>>>>
>>>>    The prohibition is clearly stated in several scriptures. The
>>>> Baudhayana Sutra, one of the Hindu Dharma Shastras, says that “making
>>>> voyages by sea” (II.1.2.2) is an offense which will cause pataniya,
>>>> loss of caste. It offers a rather difficult penance: “They shall eat
>>>> every fourth mealtime a little food, bathe at the time of the three
>>>> libations (morning, noon and evening), passing the day standing and the
>>>> night sitting. After the lapse of three years, they throw off their guilt.”
>>>> Harsha Ramamurthy in his erudite article on the issue, explains that,
>>>> according to Baudhayana Sutra, the highest authority in deciding a question
>>>> of dharma is shruti, our primary scriptures, the Vedas and Agamas. Next is
>>>> the smriti, the secondary scriptures, which include the Dharma Shastras.
>>>> Third is sampradaya, the teachings and practices of a specific lineage. He
>>>> concludes, “ because of the bans in smriti and sampradaya, such travel is
>>>> considered a banned activity.” He added that the ban applies to all three
>>>> upper castes, and not just brahmins. It also applies to sannyasins, who–in
>>>> his tradition–can only be from the brahmin caste.
>>>>
>>>>      Why the ban?
>>>>
>>>> In the Baudhayana Sutra, the ban is discussed in the context of a
>>>> description of the geographical limits of India which concludes that within
>>>> its boundary “spiritual pre-eminence is found.” Generally, two reasons are
>>>> given by scholars for the ban. The first is that it is impossible to
>>>> maintain one’s required daily religious observances on a ship, particularly
>>>> thrice-daily personal worship. The second is that one will incur the sin of
>>>> mlecchas samparka, usually politely translated as mixing with foreigners.
>>>> Mlecchas, however, is more accurately translated as “barbarian” or
>>>> “savage.” “I am told,” he said, “that there is a penance to be performed
>>>> when a sannyasin or priest crosses the ocean. The existence of this penance
>>>> shows that as per the need and their own deeper vision, a sannyasin or
>>>> priest can cross the ocean to preserve and make his mother religion
>>>> flourish. *But this should not be done for any materialistic need.”*
>>>>
>>>>      Dr. A.V. Ramana Dikshitulu, head priest of the Balaji Temple in
>>>> Tirumala, one of India’s most respected and popular pilgrimage
>>>> destinations, said, “None of our priests who serve in the main sanctum can
>>>> cross the ocean. Neither I nor any member of my family have done so,
>>>> despite lucrative offers from abroad. Serving the Lord here is most
>>>> important to us. The Balaji Temple is governed by the Vaikhanasa Agama. It
>>>> says that the people outside India are akin to mlecchas, barbarians, who do
>>>> not follow any rules or code of conduct, and therefore it forbids visiting
>>>> such places. These places have habits, food, relationships and other things
>>>> which could make us corrupt and impure.”
>>>>
>>>>            sunrise, midday and sunset, called trikal gayatri sandhya,”
>>>> he explained. “*This trikal sandhya cannot be performed on a plane or
>>>> ship; it must be done on the earth.” *Dr. Ramana Dikshitulu does not
>>>> specifically rule out “crossing” an ocean, for he himself flies
>>>> occasionally from Chennai to Kolkata, a flight which goes out over the Bay
>>>> of Bengal. But as that flight is only two hours long, he does not miss his
>>>> trikal sandhya as he would on a longer flight or a voyage by ship, and he
>>>> does not land outside India. *He was unaware of any penance to offset
>>>> crossing the ocean.*
>>>>
>>>>           Clearly the Dharma Shastras’ ban on ocean travel was intended
>>>> to maintain the religious strength and purity of the individual, and to
>>>> prevent negative external influence from non-Hindu cultures. Other cultures
>>>> had the same concern. One can note that the very word barbarian (used to
>>>> translate mleccha with a strongly negative connotation), just meant
>>>> “foreigner,” in the original Greek, yet came to describe an uncultured or
>>>> brutish person. Baudhayana Sutra makes the point more than once to
>>>> delineate ancient India’s boundaries and declare it a sacred land out of
>>>> which one should not step
>>>>
>>>> *       Hence Nachiketa Vaisvanara concept  eduvated by Dharma Raja
>>>> applied to Brahmins who did not cross the ocean and for such alone ore
>>>> mazhai is possible. Brahadaranyaka Upanishad states as under: *
>>>>
>>>> अयमाग्निर्वैश्वानरो योऽयमन्तः पुरुषे, येनेदमन्नं पच्यते यदिदमद्यते;
>>>> तस्यैष घोषो भवति यमेतत्कर्णावपिधाय शृणोति; स यदोत्क्रमिष्यन्भवति नैनं
>>>> घोषं शृणोति ॥ १ ॥
>>>> इति नवमं ब्राह्मणम् ॥
>>>>
>>>> ayamāgnirvaiśvānaro yo'yamantaḥ puruṣe, yenedamannaṃ pacyate
>>>> yadidamadyate; tasyaiṣa ghoṣo bhavati yametatkarṇāvapidhāya śṛṇoti; sa
>>>> yadotkramiṣyanbhavati nainaṃ ghoṣaṃ śṛṇoti || 1 ||
>>>> iti navamaṃ brāhmaṇam ||
>>>>
>>>> 1. This fire that is within a man and digests the food that is eaten,
>>>> is Vaiśvānara. It emits this sound that one hears by stopping the ears
>>>> thus. When a man is about to leave the body, he no more hears this sound.
>>>>
>>>> Here is another meditation like the preceding ones. *This fire is
>>>> Vaiśvānara.* Which fire? This *that* is *within a man.* Is it the
>>>> element fire that is one of the components of the body? No, it is the one
>>>> called Vaiśvānara, which *digests the food.* Which food? The food *that
>>>> is eaten* by men. That is to say, the heat in the stomach. For direct
>>>> sign of it the text says: As that fire digests the food, *it emits
>>>> this sound. *What is it? *That one hears by stopping the ears thus,* with
>>>> one’s fingers. The word ‘Etat’ is an adverb (meaning ‘thus’). One should
>>>> meditate upon that fire as Vaiśvānara, or Virāj. Here too the result is
>>>> identification with it. Incidentally a death omen is being described: 
>>>> *(When
>>>> a man,* the experiencer in this body *is about to leave the body, he
>>>> no more hears this sound*.
>>>>
>>>> K RAJARAM  IRS   16 8 23
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> On Facebook, please join
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>>>>
>>>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>>>>
>>>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>>>>
>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>>>>
>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "KeralaIyers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to keralaiyers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorKvXymajQYXU7E%2BtfBBeqNGF8Q9J54mJ7CLJNw4AYMKg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorKvXymajQYXU7E%2BtfBBeqNGF8Q9J54mJ7CLJNw4AYMKg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to iyer123+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNQOe5bicsZkoGQhVXTJLowEAK-ckvuohdO198CjOmbog%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNQOe5bicsZkoGQhVXTJLowEAK-ckvuohdO198CjOmbog%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to iyer123+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1048300645.806149.1692277413432%40mail.yahoo.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1048300645.806149.1692277413432%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqrDgsdMgjYJdh9iUaUUK30QAC8zaQd-81%2BZiS%3DePrYEw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to