First what valmiki Ramayanam reads about Surpanaka?  "
Background of Surpanakha

The youngest child of Rishi Vishrava and his second wife, Kaikesi,
Shurpanakha was given the name of “Minakshi” (the fish-eyed one) at birth.
She grew up to marry the Asura Dushtabuddhi. In the beginning,
Shurpanakha‘s husband enjoyed high favor with her brother Ravan, the King
of Lanka, and they were privileged members of Ravan’s court, however the
three fell out at some point due to Dushtabuddhi’s scheming for more power.
Ravana had Dushtabuddhi killed, an act that earned Ravan his sister’s great
displeasure.

The widowed Shurpanakha spent her time between Lanka and the jungles of
Southern India, visiting her Asura, forest-dwelling relatives, every now
and then.

Based on the Valmiki Ramyana, during one such visit, she saw Ram in the
forest of Panchavati and immediately fell in love with him. She wanted to
have Ram and masked herself as a beautiful woman utilizing the power of
Maya. She came near Ram and bowed low to touch his feet.

Ram enquired about her origin. Shurpanakha answered that she was the
daughter of grandson of Brahma and Kubera was her brother. Following that
she praised Ram’s masculine beauty and asked him to marry her. Ram said
that he is already married and is ‘Ekapatnivrata’ meaning ‘loyal to one
wife only’.

*Ram* requested her to approach his brother Lakshman. But Lakshmana
<https://universalteacher.com/1/lakshmana-valmiki-ramayana/> enjoyed
teasing her and said that he was his brother’s servant. Hence, it would be
better for her to be Ram’s second wife instead of his wife. Surpanakha
turned angry and made abusive remark about *Sita* and threatened to eat
her. *Lakshmana* came to Sita’s defense and cut off Surpanakha’s nose in
anger.

To avenge this insult, she first reacted by going to her brother Khar who
sent seven Rakshasa warriors to attack Rama, but were easily dispatched.
Khar then attacked with 700,000 soldiers including himself, who were all
killed.

She then reacted by going straight to Ravan’s court and extolling Sita’s
virtues and beauty, praising Sita as a worthy wife for Ravan, and inciting
him to abduct her by force and marry her. Ravan, despite advices to the
contrary from his brother, Vibhishana, kidnapped Sita causing the war.

There are some versions of the Ramyana which claim that *Surpanakha* had no
real romantic interest in the brothers and that she had orchestrated the
war for no reason other than to seek revenge against Ravana for her
husband’s murder.

After many years of scheming for his downfall, she discovered that Ravan
had more than a match in Ram, the young Prince of Ayodhya. Ram had killed
both her grandmother, the ferocious Thataka, and her uncle, Subahu.
Surpanakha’s cousins were afraid of the young Prince and Surpanakha decided
to pit her brother against Ram, realizing that no one else was powerful
enough to slay Ravan." (B G Tilak)

        Background of Surpanakha

The youngest child of Rishi Vishrava and his second wife, Kaikesi,
Shurpanakha was given the name of “Minakshi” (the fish-eyed one) at birth.
She grew up to marry the Asura Dushtabuddhi. In the beginning,
Shurpanakha‘s husband enjoyed high favor with her brother Ravan, the King
of Lanka, and they were privileged members of Ravan’s court, however the
three fell out at some point due to Dushtabuddhi’s scheming for more power.
Ravana had Dushtabuddhi killed, an act that earned Ravan his sister’s great
displeasure.

The widowed Shurpanakha spent her time between Lanka and the jungles of
Southern India, visiting her Asura, forest-dwelling relatives, every now
and then.

Based on the Valmiki Ramyana, during one such visit, she saw Ram in the
forest of Panchavati and immediately fell in love with him. She wanted to
have Ram and masked herself as a beautiful woman utilizing the power of
Maya. She came near Ram and bowed low to touch his feet.

Ram enquired about her origin. Shurpanakha answered that she was the
daughter of grandson of Brahma and Kubera was her brother. Following that
she praised Ram’s masculine beauty and asked him to marry her. Ram said
that he is already married and is ‘Ekapatnivrata’ meaning ‘loyal to one
wife only’.

*Ram* requested her to approach his brother Lakshman. But *Lakshmana*
<https://universalteacher.com/1/lakshmana-valmiki-ramayana/> enjoyed
teasing her and said that he was his brother’s servant. Hence, it would be
better for her to be Ram’s second wife instead of his wife. Surpanakha
turned angry and made abusive remark about *Sita* and threatened to eat
her. *Lakshmana* came to Sita’s defense and cut off Surpanakha’s nose in
anger.

To avenge this insult, she first reacted by going to her brother Khar who
sent seven Rakshasa warriors to attack Rama, but were easily dispatched.
Khar then attacked with 700,000 soldiers including himself, who were all
killed.

She then reacted by going straight to Ravan’s court and extolling Sita’s
virtues and beauty, praising Sita as a worthy wife for Ravan, and inciting
him to abduct her by force and marry her. Ravan, despite advices to the
contrary from his brother, Vibhishana, kidnapped Sita causing the war.

There are some versions of the Ramyana which claim that *Surpanakha* had no
real romantic interest in the brothers and that she had orchestrated the
war for no reason other than to seek revenge against Ravana for her
husband’s murder.

After many years of scheming for his downfall, she discovered that Ravan
had more than a match in Ram, the young Prince of Ayodhya. Ram had killed
both her grandmother, the ferocious Thataka, and her uncle, Subahu.
Surpanakha’s cousins were afraid of the young Prince and Surpanakha decided
to pit her brother against Ram, realizing that no one else was powerful
enough to slay Ravan.



       Surpanakha has been described and portrayed differently in different
versions of the Ramayana. Valmiki's Ramayana states that she was a ghora
mukhi (ugly faced), pot-bellied, cross-eyed and had oversized breasts.
Further, it says that she had thinning, brown hair and a grating voice,
which had no hint of softness or femininity in it. This version also
describes her as evil-minded, with a heart full of wickedness.
On the other hand, Tamil poet, Kamban, has a different perspective of
Surpanakha in his Kamba Ramayanam. He describes her as a strikingly
beautiful
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/search.php?q=beautiful&maincategory=&sold=&submit.x=26&submit.y=13>
woman
with long, lustrous hair, fish-shaped eyes (that is why she was given the
name Minakshi at birth), a slender form and a magnetic and bewitching
personality. She also wielded magical powers and could assume any form at
will.
As per the Kamba Ramayanam, she put all these powers to good use when she
initially approached Rama with her proposal. Rama, however, realized who
she actually was and decided to play her for a while, before finally
rejecting her.
As per the Brahmavaivarta Purana, Surpanakha later visited the holy lake of
Pushkara and prayed to Lord Brahma
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/search.php?q=brahma> that she should marry
Rama in her next birth. Accordingly, she was born as Kubja in her next
birth. She was a hunchbacked woman, who married Lord Krishna
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/read/krishna.htm>, the next incarnation of
Sri Maha Vishnu <https://www.dollsofindia.com/read/vishnu.htm>.

According to an excerpt from Devdutt Pattanaik's "Sita: An Illustrated
Retelling of the Ramayana", Sita met Surpanakha much later in her life,
when she herself was in exile in Valmiki's ashrama. At that time, Lakshmana
had abandoned the pregnant Sita in the forest, on Rama's orders. This, in
spite of the fact that she had proved her chastity by undergoing the
agni-pariksha (test of fire), for having stayed so long in Ravana's place.

According to the Uttara Ramayana, after Rama's Pattabhishekam (coronation
ceremony), some people in Ayodhya were still doubting Sita's purity and
were wondering who the father of her child could be. Rama heard them
discussing the matter and decided that it was in his kingdom's best
interest to let Sita go from there, so that no one would doubt his
integrity and adherence to his duty as King. He, however, did not have the
courage to face Sita and tell her that she should leave the palace. Hence,
he asked a reluctant Lakshmana to accompany her till the forest and then
abandon her there.
Sita, who was in immense grief, sat under a berry tree. That was when she
found Surpanakha, filled with hatred, was gloating and laughing at her. She
said that they rejected Sita, just as they rejected her. Now, Sita was
stripped of her status, just as she (Surpanakha) was stripped of her
beauty.

Though deeply hurt by the Rakshasi's words, Sita found the strength to
smile at her and offered her a berry. She told Surpanakha that the berries
were sweet - as sweet as the ones in Mandodari's garden
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/search.php?q=garden&maincategory=&sold=&submit.x=20&submit.y=18>
-
and urged her to have some.
Sita's gentleness surprised Surpanakha. She had hoped to inflict pain on
the former, but she was obviously growing beyond the pain. She realized
that she had to stop this cycle of hatred and had to start loving herself,
before expecting anyone to love her in return. That was the only way that
she could find peace within herself.

Still affected by the negativity and hatred inside her, Surpanakha argued
that she had been denied justice. Sita advised her to leave the past behind
her and start living in the present. She also told her to let bygones be
bygones and forgive everything that everyone had done to her.
Sita continued with her stand, saying that she should not get trapped and
be a victim of her own need for revenge. She stated that several Ramas and
Ravanas would come and go and that millions of people would be born and
would die, but life and nature
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/search.php?q=nature> would still continue to
exist, as it always did. She said that it was the reason why she preferred
to be here in the dense forest, in the midst of Mother Nature.
Sita's demeanour and her advice impressed Surpanakha. She realized that, in
order to see change outside, she first had to change inside. She picked up
the berry offered by Sita. It tasted sweet - it was the sweetest thing she
ever tasted. She ate another one and smiled at Sita.
With that, Surpanakha let go of all her past suffering, negativity and
hatred and started to feel truly beautiful again. She giggled happily and
playfully challenged to a race to the stream
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/search.php?q=stream&maincategory=&sold=&submit.x=23&submit.y=10>.
Off the ladies went, genuinely joyous and feeling at peace with themselves
and with the world around them.

With traditional notions and ideas undergoing immense changes in the
present modern world we live in, our perception of right and wrong has also
transformed; thus giving us a different viewpoint of the stories we heard
and read during childhood. Modern education and modern values make us
rethink these legends and wonder if there is more to them that meets the
eye - if Rama was really so pure and good; and if Surpanakha was really
that dark and evil.
In today's world, we still see unspeakable atrocities committed against
women in the name of tradition and power. Still, most women in rural areas
and many, even in urban areas, suffer attacks, assault, rape, honour
killings and so on. The shocking thing is that a major chunk of society
still blames them for this suffering. Much worse; the very definition of
rape changes with religion, caste and their class. Women who are divorced
or who do not give consent for sex are often mocked as arrogant and
immature.
In such a society, it comes as no surprise that Rama, who remained silent
while Lakshmana physically attacked Surpanakha, is still considered as the
epitome of Hindutva. On the other hand, the victim, Surpanakha, who was
marred maimed all her life, still continues to be judged for her actions.
She is looked down upon, merely because she expressed an interest towards
Rama.
Similarly, Sita was kidnapped by Ravana against her will. She had to
undergo the agni-pariksha to prove her chastity, while no one ever doubted
Rama's loyalty. In spite of him sending her to the forest at the hands of
Lakshmana, people still refer to Rama as the "Maryada Purushottam" (the
perfect follower of rules; the epitome of perfect values).
There is yet one more angle here. The fact is that Rama never experienced
peace or happiness even for a single day, after he ill-treated Surpanakha.
Likewise, Ravana never experienced joy after abducting Sita. In fact, she
was the cause of the loss of his kingdom, power, dignity and even his own
life. This probably goes to show that those who do not treat their women
properly, would finally have to face a lifetime of negative karma for it.
However, it was up to Sita and Surpanakha to find their own justice and
peace for it. They went through their storms and changed themselves, so
that they could experience peace and joy in their lives. They realized that
they should start loving themselves unconditionally, in order to unlock the
power of Shakti within themselves.

The tale of Surpanakha has a hidden meaning that all of us can learn from.
Her character shows us that nothing and no one is absolutely "good" or
"bad" as we define things from our limited experience of life. Rather,
everything and everyone (ourselves included) has shades of grey, that we
must learn to accept.
Looking at her story
<https://www.dollsofindia.com/search.php?q=story&maincategory=&sold=&submit.x=21&submit.y=16>
from
a different angle and being empathetic towards her, one would probably
discover that Surpanakha was not at all that terrible as she is projected
to be. There was probably one side of her, that was hapless, helpless,
downtrodden and frustrated. She too, probably, was the victim of
circumstances, just like Sita was. Maybe that is why the two women
eventually forgave each other and became friends for life.
The very act of Surpanakha forgiving the past proves that she had
transcended the realms of negative emotions such as anger, vanity and ego.
Her ability to let go clearly goes to show that she too had a softer side
and a heart that was filled with love and forgiveness.
Maybe we all should follow her example and learn to become less judgemental
and more accepting of everything and all around us. That way, we too would
be able to progress on the path of achieving true peace and joy in our own
lives!( Priya Viswanath)

KR   IRS   18 9 23

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chittanandam V R <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 07:30
Subject: Fwd: Tamilnayagam - kamba Ramayanam - Surpanaka (23)
To:




*கம்ப இராமாயணம் - சூர்ப்பணகை (23)*

*தமிழ்நாயகம் *

நல்லளும் அல்லள்


"மன்மதனிடம் இருந்து என்னைக் காப்பாற்று" என்று சூர்ப்பணகை இராமனிடம்
வேண்டினாள்.

இதைக் கேட்ட இராமன், என்ன செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்? "சீ! சீ! இவள் கெட்டவள். தீய
நோக்கத்தோடு வந்திருக்கிறாள்" என்று அவளை போகச் சொல்லி இருக்க வேண்டும்
அல்லவா. அதுதான் இல்லை.

இராமன் அவளை எடை போடுகிறான்.

"இவள் நாணம் இல்லாதவள். விநோதமானவள். கீழான எண்ணங்கள் கொண்டவள். நல்லவள்
அல்லள்" என்று நினைக்கிறான்.


பாடல்





*சேண் உற நீண்டு, மீண்டு, செவ் அரி சிதறி, வெவ்வேறு ஏண் உற மிளிர்ந்து,
நானாவிதம் புரண்டு, இருண்ட வாள்-கண் பூண் இயல் கொங்கை அன்னாள் அம் மொழி
புகறலோடும், 'நாண் இலள், ஐயள், நொய்யள்; நல்லளும் அல்லள்' என்றான்.*

பொருள்:

நீண்ட தொலைவு சென்று நீளமாக சென்று மீண்டும் இங்கு வந்து
கணங்கள் சிவந்து. கண்ணில் இரத்த நாளங்கள் சிவந்து இருக்க வெவ்வேறு
சிறப்பு கொண்டு பின் அதில் இருந்து பிறழ்ந்து நாலா பக்கங்களிலும் அலைந்து
கரிய கூர்மையான கத்தி போன்ற கண்களை உடையவள்
அணிகலன்களை அணிந்த மார்பகங்களை உடையவள் அவ்வாறு சொன்னவுடன்
'நாணம் இல்லாதவள், கீழான எண்ணம் கொண்டவள், விநோதமானவள்,
நல்லவள் அல்லள்' என்று இராமன் முடிவு செய்கிறான்.


எவ்வளவு தான் ஆடை அலங்காரம் பண்ணிக் கொண்டாலும், தேனொழுக பேசினாலும்,
உள்ளத்தில் உள்ளதை கண்கள் காட்டிக் கொடுத்து விடும்.

சூர்ப்பணகையின் கண்கள் அலை பாய்கின்றன.

தூரத்தில் உள்ளதை நோட்டம் விடுகிறது.

பின் பக்கத்தில் வருகிறது.

காமத்தால் சிவந்து இருக்கிறது.

நாலா பக்கமும் உருள்கிறது.

வள்ளுவர் சொல்லுவார்,


*அடுத்தது காட்டும் பளிங்கு போல் நெஞ்சம் கடுத்தது காட்டும் முகம் *

என்று.

சேண் என்றால் தொலை தூரம் என்று பொருள்.

சேண் விளங்கு அவிர் ஒளி என்பார் நக்கீரர், திருமுருகாற்றுப் படையில்.

உலகம் உவப்ப வலன் ஏர்பு திரிதரு
 பலர்புகழ் ஞாயிறு கடல்கண் டாஅங்கு
 ஓஅற இமைக்கும் சேண்விளங்கு அவிர்ஒளி .


தூரத்தில் இருக்கும் சூரிய ஒளி.

அவளின் சொல் மட்டும் கண்ணை வைத்து அவள் நல்லவள் இல்லை என்று அறிந்து
கொள்கிறான்  இராமன்.

*- தமிழ் நாயகம் *
****************************************

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoofFucboZZ0y4ct%2BmLe-GGcxGXO2Zb_R8hBSA2qgHrNwA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to