Indeed! Einstein said an atom whose partner is 1000 miles away would react similarly, where the communications are exchanged in nano seconds,through the wave pattern. Now all are thinking of a wave symbolised by pictures with the undulations of a left or right bracket , moving horizontally, vertically or in any direction as the Chess minister can move. But Broglie found it as a pattern where the waves' shapes are indefinable. As Brahmam is unknown, so too is the wave pattern. So Einstein theory is not complete and the world is still trying to find out to apply through some kind of mathematical derivations; but unbound by any pattern or mathematical conventions. And this shall be compared to our siddhar gnana-eyes and mental communications, accepted by USA NASA that distance between siddhas are immaterial for communications. Then our neuron wave patterns are also being worked out as the waves of a pair atom. Both are similar, unexplained; unpredictable; hence Schrödinger's Cat, as a thought experiment, states that if you seal a cat in a box with something that can eventually kill it, you won't know if the cat is alive or dead until you open the box. So, until you open the box and observe the cat, the cat is simultaneously dead and alive. But the box if opened the distance may vary even before you could open. Your body atom pair at 7 30 AM, might be at Betherland and delhi simultaneously, as our neuron travelling, and communications or (experimenting star trek style) transportation of persons in a nano second, or ambulimama stories of disappearing and reappearing somewhere are all -NEVER EVER A MYTH; FEASIBLE. TIME ELEMENT IS THUS NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD AND SPEED OF LIGHT IS LESSER THAN TIME IS ONLY A HUNCH. K Rajaram IRS 81224
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 at 09:39, APS Mani <[email protected]> wrote: > Tough to understand but very interesting to read! Mani > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 8:46 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Why Louis De Broglie Walked Away from His Groundbreaking Quantum Theory >> >> French physicist Louis de Broglie’s pilot wave theory proposed that >> quantum particles are directed by a guiding wave. Although de Broglie later >> renounced his theory due to its complexity and abstractness, the concept >> was revived by David Bohm and remains a topic of ongoing scientific >> exploration and debate. >> >> Celebrating a Century of Quantum Discovery >> >> Last week marked the 100-year anniversary of French physicist Louis de >> Broglie presenting his doctoral thesis, a groundbreaking work that earned >> him a Nobel prize for “his discovery of the wave nature of electrons.” His >> discovery became a cornerstone of quantum mechanics and gave rise to his >> renowned “pilot wave” theory—an alternative framework for understanding the >> quantum world. Yet, despite its significance, de Broglie later rejected his >> own theory. Why did he abandon it? >> >> Quantum mechanics, the theory describing matter on extremely small scales >> like atoms and electrons, emerged in the early 20th century. While >> revolutionary, it remains full of mysteries. One of its most puzzling >> aspects is the dual nature of quantum particles, such as electrons, which >> can exhibit both particle-like and wave-like behaviour depending on how >> they are observed. >> >> Challenging the Copenhagen Interpretation >> >> The Copenhagen interpretation, developed at the beginning of the 20th >> century, concluded that the quantum world cannot be analysed according to >> classical physical concepts. This view has met with a number of objections, >> and numerous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have looked for a >> causal and mechanistic understanding of the weirdness of quantum behaviour. >> De Broglie was among those who refused the Copenhagen reading, and he >> proposed his pilot wave theory in 1927. According to this model, matter is >> made up of particles, whose movement is guided by a “quantum wave,” thus >> explaining the reasons for the wave behaviour of particles. >> >> Wave-Particle Duality at a Macroscopic Scale >> >> Recently, scientists have been working on concepts similar to those >> developed by French physicist Louis de Broglie to interrogate the >> wave-particle duality at a macroscopic scale. Credit: Y. Couder et al. Euro >> physics News, EDP Sciences >> >> The Fall and Rise of the Pilot Wave Theory >> >> However, a few years after de Broglie made his discovery, he renounced >> his theory. What prompted this change of heart, and how did his work impact >> the scientific community? >> >> There are multiple causes for the abandonment of the pilot wave theory. >> However, two characteristics of the model have made it particularly dubious. >> First, it suggests that the motion of one particle can depend on that of >> another, even if their distance, according to Einstein’s theory of >> relativity, should prohibit any interaction. Furthermore, the pilot wave >> does not have a clear physical meaning. Unlike conventional waves, such as >> ocean waves or electromagnetic waves, it is not a wave that evolves in >> our three-dimensional physical space. Rather, it is a wave that unfolds >> in an abstract mathematical space with a large number of dimensions, >> making its interpretation difficult. These aspects of the pilot wave were >> very disturbing for de Broglie, who explicitly abandoned his theory in his >> subsequent writings. His deeper ambition was to develop a somewhat >> different approach, called the “double solution theory.” Its main object >> would have been a less abstract wave, which would unfold within the space >> familiar to our perception. This alternative model would have been much >> more intuitive and easier to understand. However, the mathematical >> complexity of this approach was considerable. De Broglie worked on this >> project until the end of his life, despite the limited interest it garnered >> from his fellow physicists. >> >> Enduring Questions and Contemporary Research >> >> De Broglie’s work has deeply influenced the scientific community. The US >> physicist David Bohm independently rediscovered pilot wave theory in >> 1952. Rather than rejecting the model because of its strangeness, Bohm and >> many other subsequent researchers have undertaken the challenge of giving >> it meaning. Questions relating to the exact content and interpretation >> of the theory are still debated today. Furthermore, the double solution >> theory that de Broglie worked on has not been completely abandoned. Some >> contemporary physicists are still working on its formulation. This >> approach may one day help us better understand our world on a small scale, >> with a reduced impact on our classical intuitions. >> >> K Rajaram IRS 81224 >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqusgrTi8Z8gXES8gz1WZ8Fn3WkEkVKqDrJs6fi6pkVDg%40mail.gmail.com.
