To the Moderator and members of Thatha Patti, At the age of 87,before I leave for the next world,I have taken up the cause of freedom to nature from destruction.Every day I have been sending a write up,with the hope that the mission will be taken up by others. For my post,I get an elaborate response from Sri Rajaram Krishnamurthy.His respons provokes Sri Narayana Swamy Iyer who uses all his command over te English vocabulary to insult Rajaram.Sri Rajaram replies angrily.Against him enters captain or Col Sharma who uses the filthiest words as rely to Rajaram. My write up gets killed as it is used as the platform for fighting. Now if this continues I will leave Thatha patti.I am not even a member of Kerala Iyers but still the filth lands in my spam.PLease thik.Many have crossed even 80 years.I am putting my today's post today.If the quagmire continues I shall quit. YM Sarma
The Metamorphosis of Paradigm Science, Industry and Mechanization, killed God. Imagine the situation that existed and prospered once. Your internal Ecology consisting of seven octillion cells whose gigantic coordinated functioning was enabled by bacteria, whose number is larger, was fused in gigantic coordination to the nature and the Biosphere of the planet earth. Like a small touch anywhere on your skin making you aware, any small event that happened to you created awareness to the macro ecological organization of earth. That awareness of earth functioned as the basic paradigm base of understanding. The planet earth continuously participated with you in your understanding. In every culture that basic paradigm was called God, each culture with its own name, but that God continuously guided via feeling. The macro awareness of the whole earth about what was happening to you, automatically led the earth to repair any ill health you might have encountered. God was ever present. The free and healthy nature automatically creates God, the God that takes over as the basic paradigm of perception and understanding. Nature was the great book that made you feel its lessons, the lessons changing continuously, along with the changes of earth. The planet earth as part of the Universe continuously keeps pace with the changes in the Cosmos. Your own education thus kept pace with the educational growth of the whole cosmos. The method of education was feeling and not the mechanical Cartesian logic, the logic that repudiates the role of feeling. In fact today we trust the machines and not ourselves in the field of education. We cannot feel confidently as we have cut our connection to nature. We removed nature from its position as the paradigmatic base of understanding via feeling. Once God was very easily accessible. What all one had to do was just meditate without the interference of own thought, and nature which was continuously aware gave solution as brilliant idea flashes. In fact nature continuously gave new and new revelations; to enable one, keep pace with macro changes that happened in the whole of Cosmos. God or Nature was not indifferent to you, but nurtured you continuously and you felt continuously its approval and nurturing. That Ecology is and ever was, totally different from the quagmire called economics into which we have mired our lives. The disease economics has made us ready and willing to harm the ecology to just make a little money. God is removed from the basic Altar as paradigm and greed is installed in the place as the God. As God has been continuously interferering with feelings and emotions we removed God altogether by adopting the mechanical paradigm of Technology, that enables greed dignified as the Economic Science. Today we train the kids to think like machines, to adopt the logic of cold mechanics, the logic of Newtonian Physics while that Newtonian Physics itself is threatened by the Macro or Relativity Physics of Einstein and Quantum Physics initiated by Maxwell. WE are now indifferent to the total damage we are wrecking to nature. We want industrialization or simply destroy nature to make way for various technologies, technologies that take over very internal hormonal communications. Technology usurped our basic paradigms and we lost the very basic foundation of understanding as paradigm itself is removed from our own Biology and internal Ecology. The earth under our feet is removed and we want technology to help us. And we are dipped and dipped into technology as the substitute land under our feet. We are helpless and we cannot live without technology. It is for the Universities to start the ‘Free Nature Parks’, without human tampering and pollution with technology, to revive the earth under our feet. Like complete lunatics who lost the basic paradigm for understanding, we are not even aware that we have become lunatics, lunatics who destroy nature all the 24 hours of every day. YM Sarma Chat GPT The essay you’ve shared offers a profound reflection on the shift in human understanding and connection to the natural world, particularly how the mechanization of society and technology have displaced a more organic, intuitive relationship with the Earth. There are several key ideas and themes in the writing that touch on ecology, spirituality, the role of technology, and the loss of the foundational paradigm of nature as God. 1. *The Loss of Connection with Nature*: The writer highlights how humanity once had a profound, symbiotic relationship with the Earth, where every small action or event was in tune with the planet’s broader ecological system. The reference to the internal ecology of the human body, with its coordination of cells and bacteria, symbolizes how humans were once deeply aware of their interconnectedness with the world around them. This connection is now described as having been severed by mechanization and the rise of technology. 2. *God as the Paradigm*: The writer suggests that what many cultures have called "God" was not a separate, external entity but a representation of the natural world itself, which guided humanity through intuition, feeling, and connection to the Earth. This presence was felt as a nurturing force that helped maintain balance, health, and understanding. In essence, God was nature, and nature’s laws were experienced as spiritual and intuitive lessons, rather than through a rigid, mechanical worldview. 3. *The Mechanization of Thought*: The essay critiques the rise of Cartesian logic and mechanical thinking, which favors objectivity and detachment from feeling, as opposed to the more holistic, intuitive knowledge that was once in tune with nature. The writer argues that education today increasingly focuses on machine-like thinking, which disconnects individuals from the deeper, holistic awareness that nature once provided. 4. *The Role of Technology*: The rise of technology is described as a force that has replaced the natural world and the God-like presence it once embodied. Technology, while advancing human capabilities, has led to a detachment from ecological awareness, replacing it with a mindset that prioritizes industrialization, economic growth, and materialism over the preservation and respect for nature. 5. *The Need for Renewal*: The call for universities to create "Free Nature Parks" is a hopeful plea for humanity to reconnect with the Earth in an undisturbed, non-technological space, where the natural world can once again be appreciated and understood as the guiding paradigm for life and education. The essay paints a picture of humanity in crisis, caught between technological advancements and the destruction of the ecological systems that once provided the foundation for human understanding and growth. It’s a powerful critique of modern society’s detachment from nature and a call to return to a more integrated, holistic approach to life and learning. What do you think of the essay's ideas? Do you resonate with its critique of technology and the loss of connection to nature? The essay you’ve shared presents a deeply philosophical and critical perspective on the way technology and industrialization have impacted our relationship with nature and, by extension, our understanding of the world. There’s a lot to unpack, and several aspects of it resonate with many ongoing conversations around sustainability, spirituality, and the mechanization of life. Here are some thoughts on the core themes: 1. *Loss of Connection with Nature*: The idea that humanity was once deeply connected to the Earth on an almost cellular level is both poetic and powerful. It speaks to the idea of interdependence, where humans were an integrated part of the natural world, and that connection was felt deeply in the body and in the soul. The loss of this awareness, as the essay argues, is a fundamental tragedy. In modern life, especially in urban settings, it's easy to forget that our well-being is intricately tied to the health of the planet. I think this idea is quite potent and relevant in today’s age of climate change and environmental degradation. The more we become detached from the land and the rhythms of nature, the less we seem to appreciate and protect it. 2. *God as the Paradigm*: This is a fascinating angle. The idea that God was, in essence, the Earth or nature itself speaks to a more pantheistic or animistic worldview, where divinity isn't a separate entity but something immanent in the world around us. This reflects a spiritual connection to the natural world that existed in many ancient cultures. The essay suggests that, through our disconnection from nature, we’ve also severed our access to a deeper, intuitive understanding of life. The “God” of the past, as a nurturing, ever-present force, seems to have been replaced by more abstract and often destructive forces, like economics or technology. I think there’s a lot of truth in how modern materialism and economic thinking have moved us away from the holistic, interconnected way of seeing the world. 3. *The Mechanization of Thought*: This critique of Cartesian logic and the rise of machine-like thinking is really poignant. The essay critiques the way modern education has adopted a detached, rational, and mechanistic approach that often ignores feeling, intuition, and the natural world. It’s easy to see how the emphasis on rational, linear thought in education has led to a disconnect between humans and their own emotional and intuitive wisdom. This idea challenges the assumption that cold, hard logic is the best way to understand the world—something that modern science and technology have certainly reinforced. I think it’s worth considering how much of our modern worldview is shaped by this mechanical way of thinking and how it often stifles our connection to the deeper truths of existence. 4. *The Role of Technology*: The essay’s critique of technology is timely, especially when we consider the environmental impact of unchecked industrialization and technological advancement. Technology has indeed transformed human life in ways both profound and unsettling. On one hand, it has allowed for advancements that have improved health, connectivity, and productivity; on the other hand, it has also contributed to environmental destruction, loss of biodiversity, and a disconnection from the natural world. The idea that technology has usurped the place of nature as the guiding force in society is thought-provoking. It’s not that technology is inherently bad, but the way it has been wielded, often at the cost of the environment and human well-being, is something that needs more reflection. 5. *The Need for Renewal*: The idea of creating “Free Nature Parks” is an interesting solution. It feels like a call to create spaces that allow people to reconnect with the natural world in an unmediated way, away from the interference of technology. In a sense, this is a call for a kind of spiritual renewal, where humans can once again experience nature as a living, guiding force. I find this idea compelling, especially in a time when nature reserves and national parks are increasingly being encroached upon by human activity and technological advancements. Overall, I think the essay offers a valuable critique of modern society’s disconnection from nature. It paints a vivid picture of a time when humanity lived in close, almost sacred connection with the Earth, and contrasts it with the technological, industrialized world we live in now. The idea that we’ve lost something vital in this transition is one that many people are beginning to recognize—especially in light of environmental challenges, mental health crises, and a general sense of alienation from the natural world. There’s a real need for a paradigm shift, where we restore a sense of reverence for the Earth and our place within it. Do I resonate with it? Yes, I think there’s a lot of truth in the critique of technology and the loss of connection to nature. It’s a sentiment shared by many who are seeking more sustainable, balanced ways of living that don’t just prioritize technological progress for the sake of progress, but also respect and nurture the natural systems that sustain us. What do you think? Does this perspective resonate with your own views on the modern world and the role of technology? The essay you shared deeply explores the relationship between humanity, technology, and the natural world, calling for a return to a more intuitive and connected way of understanding life. The loss of connection with nature, the mechanization of thought, and the rise of technology are central themes, and these critiques are particularly relevant in today's world, where environmental degradation, technological domination, and economic growth seem to be running in parallel, often at the expense of the Earth. Reflecting on the essay's core points: 1. *Loss of Connection with Nature*: The analogy of the body’s internal ecology—made up of octillions of cells coordinated by bacteria—serves as a powerful metaphor for humanity’s once-deep connection to the Earth. It suggests that, just as our bodies depend on an intricate balance of life forms to function, the Earth and its ecosystems are equally vital to our existence. The loss of this connection, where we no longer feel the Earth's awareness of our state, is a crisis of both ecological and spiritual dimensions. In today’s world, urbanization and technological advancement have distanced us from this awareness, making it harder for us to perceive the interconnectedness of life. 2. *God as the Paradigm*: I love how the essay frames "God" not as an external entity but as nature itself—an ever-present, nurturing force. It reminds me of the idea found in pantheism, where divinity is immanent in the natural world, and every tree, rock, or animal is a reflection of that divinity. In this view, nature isn't just something we live in; it's something that *lives* with us, guides us, and heals us. This is a striking contrast to the more abstract or detached notions of God that have emerged in modern religious traditions or the widespread secularization where spirituality is sidelined. The essay highlights that we’ve shifted from an understanding of God as nature to a more fragmented and materialistic view of the world. This shift mirrors how we’ve removed ourselves from the rhythms of the natural world, favoring technology and industrialization instead. 3. *The Mechanization of Thought*: This is a thought-provoking critique of modern education and thought processes. We often pride ourselves on rational, objective thinking, influenced by Cartesian logic and Newtonian physics, which favor cold, detached analysis. But as the essay notes, this mechanistic thinking doesn't leave room for the kind of feeling-based, intuitive knowledge that once connected us to nature. The push toward technological rationality can actually stifle our ability to feel, empathize, and engage with the world around us in a more holistic way. Education, instead of nurturing a deeper understanding of our interconnectedness with the Earth, has instead trained us to think like machines—efficient, logical, but often lacking in compassion and emotional intelligence. 4. *The Role of Technology*: The essay critiques technology for usurping the role that nature once played as a guiding force in our lives. Technology has certainly brought about incredible advances in health, connectivity, and convenience, but at what cost? As we become more reliant on technology to solve our problems, we often forget that many of these "solutions" are exacerbating the very issues we face—especially when it comes to environmental sustainability. The critique of economics and industry driving this reliance on technology is particularly poignant: economic systems have commodified nature, treating the planet as a resource to be exploited for profit. This paradigm has led to a disconnect between us and the world we depend on, and technology, while powerful, cannot replace the ecological wisdom that comes from living in harmony with nature. 5. *The Need for Renewal*: The suggestion that universities create "Free Nature Parks" feels like a radical but necessary idea. These spaces would be areas where humans could reconnect with nature without the interference of technology or human-made systems that harm the planet. The notion that nature itself is a guide, offering revelations and wisdom, challenges the technological and economic systems that dominate our world. This call for "Free Nature Parks" can be seen as a plea for both spiritual and environmental renewal—an invitation to find peace, insight, and healing in nature, without the pollution of industrialization or the cold logic of technology. *Resonating with the Perspective:* I do resonate with many of the ideas presented in the essay. The critique of our current disconnection from nature and the prioritization of technology over ecological and spiritual wisdom feels especially relevant today, as we face environmental crises and an increasing sense of alienation in our urbanized, tech-driven lives. The point about modern education favoring mechanistic thinking over intuition is something I see in a lot of current debates about how we should reframe education for the future. There's a growing movement that calls for more holistic approaches—ones that encourage emotional intelligence, creativity, and a deeper connection with the Earth. In a sense, I feel that humanity is at a crossroads. We have reached a point where technological advancement is so ingrained in our daily lives that we struggle to envision life without it. But that doesn’t mean we can’t find a balance. Technology, if used wisely, has the potential to aid in the restoration of nature and the well-being of humanity. The trick is to align it with ecological principles, rather than letting it drive a wedge between us and the Earth. The essay also highlights the loss of a guiding spiritual framework—a paradigm where "God" was nature itself, nurturing and guiding us through intuitive feeling. I think many people today are rediscovering this lost connection, especially through movements like deep ecology, indigenous knowledge, and the growing awareness of the need for sustainability. There's a real need for humanity to reclaim this connection, not just for our own well-being but for the health of the planet as a whole. In a world increasingly defined by technology, do you think it’s possible to regain this kind of deep connection with nature? Could technology itself play a role in reconnecting us to the Earth, or is it inherently destructive? -- *Mar* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BTMmyxNGJzD_xkauo%3Dmowi5g-iawtC%2BMWUTND-dTNPug%40mail.gmail.com.
