a good observation KR ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Srinivasan Sridharan <sridhsriniva...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 at 16:31 Subject: Fwd: INDIAN JUDICIARY To: N Sekar <nseka...@yahoo.com>, Rajaram Krishnamurthy < keyarinc...@gmail.com>, Raman Rangarajan <ra...@ramaccountancy.com>
*Date:* April 24, 2025 From sridharan < sridhsriniva...@gmail.com> *Subject:* *INDIAN JUDICIARY* When the anchor asked former Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi a question about India's judicial system, former Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that even if I want, I cannot improve India's judiciary because our judicial system is in the hands of some big fixers (brokers) and these big fixers run our judicial system the way they want whenever they want. These fixers and brokers are none other than Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi. In this program, Justice Ranjan Gogoi further raised even bigger questions on the judiciary such as if India has to become a 5 trillion economy, then India cannot become a 5 trillion economy until it changes its judicial system because India's judicial system has become so ruined and like a termite, it is weakening not only this country but also the economy and the fabric of this country by piercing them. He further said that India's judicial system can never give justice to a middle class or a poor person and this is a bitter truth if you are a very rich person or a billionaire. Then you will get justice and your lawyers will tell our judges what decision to give and these few big lawyers have become the biggest fixers of the Supreme Court today. The Supreme Court did not do anything on this statement of Justice Ranjan Gogoi even if it wanted to because every judge of the Supreme Court knows that he is trapped in the clutches of big fixers (brokers) like Dushyant Dave, Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Prashant Bhushan and these people run the Supreme Court of India the way they want. Now you can understand some examples of how bitter things Justice Ranjan Gogoi had said. It would have been great if he had given some examples and some names too. There are two cases, both are exactly the same. The Maharashtra government accused BJP leader Kirit Somaiya that he took donations from people to save INS Virat and did not give any account of that donation to the government and arrest warrants were issued against him. Kirit Somaiya was arrested in the lower court and then in the Mumbai High Court. She went to court i.e. three courts for anticipatory bail but all three courts did not grant her anticipatory bail Now look at another example, Teesta Javed Setalvad, who made a living out of the Gujarat riots, took donations of about 100 crores from Gulf countries, America, Britain and many other places. Investigation revealed that the bills for all her purchases were paid from her trust account. Even the bills for buying gold jewellery at Dubai airport or duty free liquor at the airport in Britain were paid from the trust's money. Then another trustee of her trust, Sabrang, filed a police case. The police first investigated for 6 months and collected all the evidence, after which they went to Mumbai to arrest Teesta Javed. Teesta Javed did not open the door of her house. In 10 minutes, the Supreme Court's decision was sent to a police station in the area by mail that an order has been issued to stop Teesta from being arrested. It was revealed that Kapil Sibal got this order passed by a Supreme Court judge over the phone, meaning this is the first time in the history of India that when the Supreme Court The court conducted the hearing over the phone and passed the order in just 3 minutes of telephonic hearing Rana Ayyub did the same thing. She also did not get the donations collected in the name of Gujarat riots audited and deposited Rs 5 crore out of it in her father's name as fixed deposit. There is all the evidence against her too. When she was going abroad and she was stopped from going abroad, then Mumbai High Court said that Rs 5 crore is not such a big amount that it can be considered a big fraud. A bus conductor had to fight a case for 40 years on the charge of embezzling 20 paise, then our judicial system did not say that 20 paise is not a big amount. Look at the example of Jahangirpuri As soon as the bulldozers reached Jahangirpuri at 10:30, at 10:31, Jamaat-e-Ulema's lawyers Kapil Sibal, Dushyant Dave and Prashant Bhushan went straight to the Supreme Court. The hearing was done in a hurry and at exactly 10:45, the Supreme Court gave its stay order. I was surprised that how such a case was heard so quickly and the order was given so quickly while the higher court of Indian judicial system, i.e. the lower court, High Court and Supreme Court were not even taken into consideration. Send feedback -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooJi7gHpZg4RjcpX4QRdO2V8pPjVjmoheoRm6XB%2BJmOGA%40mail.gmail.com.
