> On 22 Jul 2006, at 10:08, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Local path: The term "local path" will mean nothing to most users, > >> but we could provide a "View in Explorer" or "View in Finder" right- > >> click option for the user to open the file in their operating > >> system's file-system browser (assuming Java can do this). > > > > Or "copy file location" ? > > Good idea. > Hm .... my idea when I added this field, was to help the user to remind where will be located the files being downloaded. As I said in a previous mail, take advantage of a "copy file location" would be really harder for the normal user.
> >> Priority: Meaningless to most users > > > > You think? It's a very common concept - don't other tools provide > > this? > > Some do, but we shouldn't show it unless people can change it, > I've planned to make it changeable. > and do > we really want people mucking around with it, given that they are > likely to change everything to be the highest priority? > If they want to put the highest priority, they will, even if they must use another tool / wait for another tool allowing that. > My gut > feeling is "if in doubt, leave it out". > I think advanced / non-advanced modes could solve these usability problems. > Ian. > > Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. > phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -- Jerome Flesch.
