I would think z=np.dot(x,y) is more meaningful but anyway apparently dot() has different meanings in Theano's world.
thanks On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 3:59:14 PM UTC-7, Buruk Aregawi wrote: > > It seems that np.dot is interpreting this as the more standard A*x where A > is a 2x3 matrix and x is a 3 dimensional vector. Where as theano is > interpreting it is X*A where X is a 3x1 matrix and A is a 2x3 matrix. > If you do > z = T.dot(x,y) > instead of > z = np.dot(x,y) > they will both work the same and the theano function will interpret it as > the standard A*x. > > On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 5:55:10 PM UTC-4, DL_user wrote: >> >> Why do these two functions have different outputs, even both of them >> defined from numpy's dot() function: >> >> x = T.dmatrix('x') >> >> y = T.dvector('y') >> >> z = np.dot(x,y) >> >> f = theano.function([x,y],z) >> >> f([[1,2,3],[4,5,6]],[7,8,9]) >> Out[31]: >> array([[ 7., 16., 27.], >> [28., 40., 54.]]) >> >> np.dot([[1,2,3],[4,5,6]],[7,8,9]) >> Out[32]: array([ 50, 122]) >> > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "theano-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to theano-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.