I think it is very useful. CT is an extension to the WebPKI for SSL it is dealing in organizations.
In PPE I am proposing a Trust infrastructure to support individual users so PPE = PKIX + PGP + CT. I don't think you want to be discussing that on the Trans working group even if we end up using Trans data formats in PPE. Though what would be very relevant to Trans would be questions like 'are the data structures proposed for Trans sufficiently extensible to support other applications'. If Trans can't support PPE then that is a specification smell. So it is relevant in that situation. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 2/17/14 9:35 AM, Trevor Perrin wrote: > > I thought this list was for more general discussion - not just CT? > > We don't need to shut this list down if people find it useful. > The main issues were 1) whether or not to create a separate > trans working group mailing list, and 2) whether or not to > subscribe everybody on this mailing list to the new one. > > Melinda > > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > therightkey@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list therightkey@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
