Wolfgang Zillig wrote:
> Why don't you use VRML?
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
VRML is dead. I had cave surveys in it and it was never satisfying.
The next thing might be:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/08/06/x3d.html.
Ultimately, computer images are 2D, and the fuss about making high frame
rates merely so you can drag the mouse back and forth is, I think,
over-rated. Animation in time is very useful on a 3D image, but not
necessarily animation in viewing angle. Unfortunately all the tools are
optimized to do the latter, but not the former.
Julian T.
