Tarquin, sorry, but what is the reason to use two calibrate commands in two consecutive lines in your example?
calibrate tape 0 0.5 calibrate tape 0 Martin > 14. 8. 2020 v 20:47, Tarquin Wilton-Jones via Therion <therion@speleo.sk>: > > Hi folks, > > Think I may have uncovered a bug in Therion's parsing of the "calibrate > tape" command. > > Survex: > *calibrate tape 0 0.5 > *calibrate tape 0 > 1 2 10 0 0 > *calibrate tape 0 1 > 2 3 10 90 0 > > Therion: > calibrate tape 0 0.5 > calibrate tape 0 > 1 2 10 0 0 > calibrate tape 0 1 > 2 3 10 90 0 > > In Survex, both legs are 10 m long. In Therion, the first leg is 5 m > long and the second is 10 m long. > > Therion book: > "The syntax is borrowed from Survex with minor modifications; the Survex > manual may be useful as an additional reference for the user." > > Survex manual does not say what happens to the scale value when it is > omitted, but it does say "By default, the zero error is 0.0 and the > scale factor 1.0 for all quantities." This implies that the scale value > should reset to 1 whenever it is omitted. > > Assuming Survex is "right" with this behaviour, does that mean Therion > is wrong? Or is this one of those "minor differences"? > > Or if I just messed up, someone please shout at me ;) > > Cheers, > > Tarquin > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion@speleo.sk > https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion _______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
