Misplaced station? Martin
Odesláno z iPhonu > 6. 12. 2024 v 13:59, Bill Gee <[email protected]>: > > By "double station" you mean two survey stations at the same location - > right? I did a grep on the .th2 files and found no stations where the point > coordinates were the same, and also no instance of two stations with the same > name in one scrap. > > There are three stations which exist in both scraps, but that should not be a > problem. They are on the seam between the scraps. > > I think the next thing for me to do is create another scrap or two and see > how they can be made to fit in. > > =============== > Bill Gee > >> On 12/6/24 02:25, Martin Sluka via Therion wrote: >> Check if there is not a double station in a scrap - squezed pillar. >> Martin >> Odesláno z iPhonu >>> 5. 12. 2024 v 22:40, Bill Gee <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I gave this a try ... I drew partial pillars on the edge of each scrap >>> using a normal wall line. I changed the straight lines between the pillars >>> to -visibility off, and I added a "join scrap1 scrap2 -count 2" to the .th >>> file. The result is not quite as badly mangled, but it is still not right. >>> >>> Taking out the join statement gives a map that makes more sense. There are >>> still some artifacts where the two scraps join, and the walls on the pillar >>> between those two scraps don't line up quite right. >>> >>> I also tried it using "join scrap1 scrap2" and no -count option. That >>> produced a reasonable map. The wall on the east side now has a smooth >>> join. The pillar in the middle still has discontinuities. >>> >>> I checked the "reverse" box on the pillars which are completely contained >>> in a scrap. It made no difference I can see. When I drew those lines, I >>> went in a counter-clockwise direction. >>> >>> On the upper scrap I drew lines between the pillars. I did not draw those >>> same lines on the lower scrap. Is that needed? >>> >>> One thing that is very apparent here is that the in-cave survey and >>> sketching will have to be done exactly right. >>> >>> Two attached PDF files, one with the "join count 2" statement and the other >>> with no join statement. >>> >>> =============== >>> Bill Gee >>> >>> On 12/5/24 13:19, Bruce Mutton wrote: >>>>> If I draw only that part of the column which is in each scrap, can I >>>>> still use "-outline in"? >>>> No, those remain -outline out. >>>> Also your sketches for surveys should not include the parts of the pillar >>>> walls that have not been surveyed! >>>>> Will I need to use line joins to get the two parts of the column to come >>>>> together? >>>> No, use join scrap1 scrap2 -count 2 >>>> And you will need to replace line wall -subtype invisible with line wall >>>> -visibility off as is intimated in >>>> https://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/drawingchecklist#wall >>>>> And will that result in a column that is entirely white on the inside? >>>> Yes, but only once you have all wall lines in place and parameters for all >>>> lines correct (-reverse, -outline, -subtype, -visibility) >>>> Bruce >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Therion mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion >>> <PracticeMine-WithJoin.pdf> >>> <PracticeMine-WithoutJoin.pdf> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Therion mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion >> _______________________________________________ >> Therion mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion > > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion _______________________________________________ Therion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
