Thank you… seems like counting -author in the scrap files is the way to go then… maybe its an idea to count objects in a scrap, to get a very raw estimate of „workload done“.
> Am 06.03.2025 um 20:11 schrieb Bruce Mutton <[email protected]>: > > >> >> But I need "drawed length", to see who contributet how much to the >> maps drawings. > > My understanding (from much forum watching rather than actual knowledge) is > that when Therion exports map(s) made of scraps (ie not with any maps > comprised of centrelines), then the length presented in the statistics is > length of 'whole centrelines' associated with those scraps. Unfortunately > (perhaps) the finest resolution of the length calculation is on a 'per > centreline' basis (as opposed to 'per leg'). That means that the length > reported will almost always overestimate the length that is directly 'under' > the 'footprint' of scraps exported. > So while yes, it is easiest to count the number of scraps authored by each > person, it should also be possible to use a similar logic to report the > length of whole centrelines beneath scraps drawn by each person. If there > are many scrap authors per centreline, the statistic would be worthless due > to double reporting of authors for each centreline, but if it is reasonable > to assume that mostly a scrap author will draw all the scraps for a > particular days survey, the double reporting will be minimised. > For surveys that contain only one centreline, the blurring of resolution > probably make this a forlorn effort. May as well count scraps per person > instead - this is a way of encouraging and rewarding what I consider to be > the good practice of drawing short scraps! > Bruce > > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion _______________________________________________ Therion mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
