Thanks for you answer. I am a little confused by your beofre_filter comment. Would you not want to use an after_filter so that once the model has been updated you update the DB? I assume you mean the before_filter for controllers.
On Apr 21, 8:31 am, James Healy <[email protected]> wrote: > tashfeen.ekram wrote: > > I am thinking that I can not index this directly since sphinx acts > > directly with the db. I was thinking of creating a new column in the > > table that would just hold all of the tags for each record for the > > purpses of indexing. Is there a smarter way to do this? > > Your idea is probably the best way of doing it. > > It's fairly common to use a before filter on your indexed model to add in > data for sphinxes use only. Things like de-normalised unicode strings > and virtual attributes are prime candidates. > > -- James Healy <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:17:07 +1000 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
