Hi Sohan weight and relevance are actually the same thing - Sphinx aliases one to the other, so each_with_weighting, and the weight values in the results hash, are what you want.
Ideally, Sphinx should choose one name and stick with it, because yeah, it is a bit confusing. Hope this helps. Cheers -- Pat On 23/04/2010, at 8:17 AM, Sohan wrote: > Hi All: > I greatly appreciate your efforts on this project. > > Now, I am stuck with one simple thing that I believe you ppl can help > me in quick time. Please let me know how to get the raw relevance > score out of the search. I see the weight is available as a the output > of the results method and also via each_with_weighting. Is there > anything similar for the relevance? > > If there's none, please point me to the place where I should change > the code to get this relevance score. I need this urgently and any > help is admired. > > Thank you. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
